Re: [PATCH] asm-generic: correct reference to GENERIC_LIB_DEVMEM_IS_ALLOWED

[<Conor.Dooley@microchip.com>]

+CC Palmer's current email
(idk if his google one directs, but JIC)

On 07/07/2022 13:13, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 1:40 PM Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 6:52 PM Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 06 Oct 2021 08:17:38 PDT (-0700), Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 5:00 PM Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Commit 527701eda5f1 ("lib: Add a generic version of devmem_is_allowed()")
>>>>> introduces the config symbol GENERIC_LIB_DEVMEM_IS_ALLOWED, but then
>>>>> falsely refers to CONFIG_GENERIC_DEVMEM_IS_ALLOWED (note the missing LIB
>>>>> in the reference) in ./include/asm-generic/io.h.
>>>>>
>>>>> Luckily, ./scripts/checkkconfigsymbols.py warns on non-existing configs:
>>>>>
>>>>> GENERIC_DEVMEM_IS_ALLOWED
>>>>> Referencing files: include/asm-generic/io.h
>>>>>
>>>>> Correct the name of the config to the intended one.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixes: 527701eda5f1 ("lib: Add a generic version of devmem_is_allowed()")
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>
>>> Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>
>>>
>>> Thanks.  I'm going to assume this is going in through some other tree,
>>> but IIUC I sent the buggy patch up so LMK if you're expecting it to go
>>> through mine.
>>
>> Palmer, Arnd,
>>
>> the patch in this mail thread got lost and was not picked up yet.
>>
>> MAINTAINERS suggests that Arnd takes patches to include/asm-generic/,
>> since commit 1527aab617af ("asm-generic: list Arnd as asm-generic
>> maintainer") in 2009, but maybe the responsibility for those files has
>> actually moved on to somebody (or nobody) else and we just did not
>> record that yet in MAINTAINERS.
>>
>> Arnd, will you pick this patch and provide it further to Linus Torvalds?
>>
>> Otherwise, Palmer already suggested picking it up himself.
>>
> 
> I've applied it to the asm-generic tree and can send it as a bugfix
> pull request. I don't have any other fixer for that branch at the moment,
> so if Palmer has other fixes for the riscv tree already, it would
> save me making a pull request if he picks it up there.
> 
>         Arnd