linux-arch.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch v1 45/55] ARC: unaligned access emulation
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 16:00:19 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50D2E8BB.6000108@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50D2B75A.3000208@synopsys.com>

On Thursday 20 December 2012 12:29 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On Monday 12 November 2012 07:30 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Monday 12 November 2012, Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com wrote:
>>> +
>>> +config ARC_MISALIGN_ACCESS
>>> +       bool "Emulate unaligned memory access (userspace only)"
>>> +       default N
>>> +       help
>>> +         This enables misaligned 16 & 32 bit memory access from user space.
>>> +         Use ONLY-IF-ABS-NECESSARY as it will be very slow and also can hide
>>> +         potential bugs in code
>>
>> parisc and ia64 both have the same feature, and they use sysctl to configure
>> it at run-time. Maybe you should pick one of the two sysctl implementations
>> and hook that up to your implementation as well.
> 
> Sounds like a good idea.
> 
> Looking at your suggestion, the sysctl interface in both of those is for
> slightly different semantics and ARC would possibly need a bit from
> both. So to avoid duplication, I'm proposing following changes to
> kernel/sysctl.c and the generic options selected by respective arches.
> 
> * no_unaligned_warning:CONFIG_IA64 => CONFIG_SYSCTL_ARCH_UNALIGN_NO_WARN
> *unaligned_enabled: __hppa__ => CONFIG_SYSCTL_ARCH_UNALIGN_ALLOW
> 
> If you can think of better(smaller) names, please do let me know :-)
> 
> If we agree in principle, I'll cookup the patches and seek the ACKs from
> ARCH maintainers (assuming my CC list above is right). And to keep
> things simple, we can route the kernel/sysctl.c changes via the ARC
> submission tree.
> 
> Thx,
> Vineet
> 

Sorry for a naive patch submitter question (yes I've already read
SubmittingPatches and googled much already). A lot of times, I see the
"Cc: ..." lines, just below the "Signed-off-by:" lines in the patch -
e.g. https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/4/318
Are those added manually - because none of the xxx-cc options to
format-patch or send-email seem to be doing that - unless I missed some.

Context: I have the patch which touches ia64/parisc which I want to send
out and at the same time have those "Cc: lines for the maintainers too"

Thx,
-Vineet

* It's OK to "look" fool once - rather than actually "being" a fool rest
of your life !

  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-20 10:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 100+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-12 11:48 [RFC Patch v1 00/55] Addons to Synopsys ARC Linux kernel Port Vineet.Gupta1
2012-11-12 11:48 ` [RFC Patch v1 32/55] ARC: [optim] Cache "current" in Register r25 Vineet.Gupta1
2012-11-12 11:48   ` Vineet.Gupta1
2012-11-12 13:50   ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-11-15 10:22     ` Vineet Gupta
2012-11-15 10:22       ` Vineet Gupta
2012-11-12 11:48 ` [RFC Patch v1 33/55] ARC: ptrace support Vineet.Gupta1
2012-11-12 11:48   ` Vineet.Gupta1
2012-11-12 13:51   ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-11-12 13:51     ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-11-15 10:24     ` Vineet Gupta
2012-11-15 10:24       ` Vineet Gupta
2012-11-15 11:56       ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-11-12 11:48 ` [RFC Patch v1 34/55] ARC: futex Vineet.Gupta1
2012-11-12 11:48   ` Vineet.Gupta1
2012-11-12 11:48 ` [RFC Patch v1 35/55] ARC: oprofile support Vineet.Gupta1
2012-11-12 11:48   ` Vineet.Gupta1
2012-11-12 11:48 ` [RFC Patch v1 36/55] ARC: ARCompact 2 levels IRQ (high/low priority) Handling Vineet.Gupta1
2012-11-12 11:48   ` Vineet.Gupta1
2012-11-12 11:48 ` [RFC Patch v1 37/55] ARC: dynamic loadable module support Vineet.Gupta1
2012-11-12 11:48   ` Vineet.Gupta1
2012-11-12 13:53   ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-11-15 10:28     ` Vineet Gupta
2012-11-12 11:48 ` [RFC Patch v1 38/55] ARC: Low level event capture/logging Vineet.Gupta1
2012-11-12 11:48   ` Vineet.Gupta1
2012-11-12 13:55   ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-11-15 10:40     ` Vineet Gupta
2012-11-15 12:04       ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-12-20  6:22         ` Vineet Gupta
2012-11-12 11:48 ` [RFC Patch v1 39/55] ARC: kernel diagnostics: show_regs() etc Vineet.Gupta1
2012-11-12 11:48   ` Vineet.Gupta1
2012-11-12 11:48 ` [RFC Patch v1 40/55] ARC: SMP support Vineet.Gupta1
2012-11-12 11:48   ` Vineet.Gupta1
2012-11-12 11:48 ` [RFC Patch v1 41/55] ARC: dwarf2 stack unwinder Vineet.Gupta1
2012-11-12 11:48   ` Vineet.Gupta1
2012-11-12 11:49 ` [RFC Patch v1 42/55] ARC: stacktracing APIs based on dw2 unwinder Vineet.Gupta1
2012-11-12 11:49 ` [RFC Patch v1 43/55] ARC: disassembly (needed by kprobes/kgdb/unaligned-access-emul) Vineet.Gupta1
2012-11-12 11:49   ` Vineet.Gupta1
2012-11-12 11:49 ` [RFC Patch v1 44/55] ARC: kprobes support Vineet.Gupta1
2012-11-12 11:49   ` Vineet.Gupta1
2012-11-12 11:49 ` [RFC Patch v1 45/55] ARC: unaligned access emulation Vineet.Gupta1
2012-11-12 11:49   ` Vineet.Gupta1
2012-11-12 14:00   ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-12-20  6:59     ` Vineet Gupta
2012-12-20 10:30       ` Vineet Gupta [this message]
2012-12-20 10:34         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-12-20 11:11       ` [PATCH] sysctl: some arch specific unaligned access knobs made generic Vineet.Gupta1
2012-12-20 11:11         ` [PATCH] sysctl: convert arch specific unaligned access regulators to generic ones Vineet.Gupta1
2013-01-03  6:47       ` [RESEND PATCH] Convert IA64 sysctl to generic Vineet Gupta
2013-01-03  6:47         ` Vineet Gupta
2013-01-03  6:47         ` [RESEND PATCH] sysctl: Enable IA64 "ignore-unaligned-usertrap" to be used cross-arch Vineet Gupta
2013-01-03  6:47           ` Vineet Gupta
2013-01-08 23:43           ` Tony Luck
2013-01-08 23:43             ` Tony Luck
2013-01-09 14:14             ` Vineet Gupta
2013-01-09 14:36               ` [PATCH v2] " Vineet Gupta
2013-01-09 18:55                 ` Tony Luck
2013-01-09 18:55                   ` Tony Luck
2013-01-09 21:03                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-01-09 21:03                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-01-10  4:13                   ` Vineet Gupta
2013-01-03  6:59       ` [RESEND PATCH] Convert PARISC sysctl to be generic Vineet Gupta
2013-01-03  6:59         ` [RESEND PATCH] sysctl: Enable PARISC "unaligned-trap" to be used cross-arch Vineet Gupta
2013-01-15 22:03           ` Helge Deller
2013-01-15 22:03             ` Helge Deller
2012-12-20  8:08     ` [RFC Patch v1 45/55] ARC: unaligned access emulation Vineet Gupta
2012-12-20  8:51       ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-11-12 11:49 ` [RFC Patch v1 46/55] ARC: kgdb support Vineet.Gupta1
2012-11-12 11:49 ` [RFC Patch v1 47/55] ARC: startup #2: Verbose Boot reporting / feature verification Vineet.Gupta1
2012-11-12 11:49   ` Vineet.Gupta1
2012-11-12 11:49 ` [RFC Patch v1 48/55] ARC: [plat-arfpga] BVCI Latency Unit setup Vineet.Gupta1
2012-11-12 11:49   ` Vineet.Gupta1
2012-11-12 14:02   ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-17  5:08     ` Vineet Gupta
2012-11-12 11:49 ` [RFC Patch v1 49/55] perf, ARC: Enable building perf tools for ARC Vineet.Gupta1
2012-11-12 11:49   ` Vineet.Gupta1
2012-11-12 11:49 ` [RFC Patch v1 50/55] ARC: perf support (software counters only) Vineet.Gupta1
2012-11-12 11:49   ` Vineet.Gupta1
2012-11-12 11:49 ` [RFC Patch v1 51/55] modpost: Ignore ARC specific non-alloc section Vineet.Gupta1
2012-11-12 11:49   ` Vineet.Gupta1
2012-12-27 10:47   ` [RESEND PATCH] modpost: For ARC Port submission Vineet Gupta
2012-12-27 10:47     ` Vineet Gupta
2012-12-27 10:47     ` [PATCH] modpost: Ignore ARC specific non-alloc sections Vineet Gupta
2012-12-27 20:48       ` Sam Ravnborg
2012-12-28  4:42         ` Vineet Gupta
2012-12-28  4:42           ` Vineet Gupta
2013-01-02  0:49         ` Rusty Russell
2013-01-02  0:49           ` Rusty Russell
2013-01-02  5:16           ` Vineet Gupta
2012-11-12 11:49 ` [RFC Patch v1 52/55] ARC: Support for single cycle Close Coupled Mem (CCM) Vineet.Gupta1
2012-11-12 11:49   ` Vineet.Gupta1
2012-11-12 14:10   ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-17  5:09     ` Vineet Gupta
2013-01-17 10:53       ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-11-12 11:49 ` [RFC Patch v1 53/55] ARC: Hostlink Pseudo-Driver for Metaware Debugger Vineet.Gupta1
2012-11-12 11:49   ` Vineet.Gupta1
2012-11-12 11:49 ` [RFC Patch v1 54/55] ARC: [plat-arcfpga] defconfig Vineet.Gupta1
2012-11-12 11:49   ` Vineet.Gupta1
2012-11-12 11:49 ` [RFC Patch v1 55/55] ARC: Add self to MAINTAINERS Vineet.Gupta1
2012-11-12 11:49   ` Vineet.Gupta1

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50D2E8BB.6000108@synopsys.com \
    --to=vineet.gupta1@synopsys.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).