From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Hogan Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/44] Meta Linux Kernel Port Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 13:16:26 +0000 Message-ID: <50F010AA.2010708@imgtec.com> References: <1357831872-29451-1-git-send-email-james.hogan@imgtec.com> <20130111103442.b80ddbfb11ef322ed28ca3b3@canb.auug.org.au> <50EFD824.3010502@imgtec.com> <20130112000336.1f24c42237fab4fe0c305ff6@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig823A3CD30027C9D3E2467A1F" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130112000336.1f24c42237fab4fe0c305ff6@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org --------------enig823A3CD30027C9D3E2467A1F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Stephen, On 11/01/13 13:03, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 09:15:16 +0000 James Hogan = wrote: >> >> On 10/01/13 23:34, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> You really should not base development work on linux-next and before = I >>> can include it there you will need to rebase it onto Linus' tree (or = some >>> other tree that does not rebase). Its OK to test by doing a merge wi= th >>> linux-next ... >> >> Thanks for the info Stephen. So I suppose if the patchset depended on >> things in -next the normal way to do it would be to merge in the >> individual trees I needed first? >=20 > Yep, but please let the maintainers of those trees know that you expect= > their tree to not be rebased. Or, if if they aren't really dependencie= s > just conflicts, then leave the other tree out and let me and Linus fix > the conflicts when we merge your tree. >=20 Okay, thanks. Due to the recent merge window the dependencies are trivial at the moment, and it wouldn't introduce build breakage to exclude them (i.e. it's just removing selects from Kconfig files and defconfigs that have been removed in linux-next), so I'll exclude those changes for now and deal with them later. Cheers James --------------enig823A3CD30027C9D3E2467A1F Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQ8BC8AAoJEKHZs+irPybfYfAP/jY3PVHNZdb4SHsvUII13uIR /8mhNdpuIMMWSKHdXwCsu/A/AhbjIT77ubwtIQoZgfI6d3RIdzEKV3eyr0UcP0lW JwG++P1wuSLSQTu9/pZVLR7LJsydFj2qsyQhnBNt1ApdjrkoEW+0nDrSfk6Wy0vY 5Wb0hSLft/CZRa5iWcXBt5JEI0VWPXwQBOXanrEfGCGFk97yB1Ysjj24PjJXaeJG 6/Ue3Dns2abEK1O+anzbYT/BrHEo9C+LtcxooNgD9G4NfjoNgJ+ZAFq1xRdmicqQ 19/wg99m7HfSLcf+GQhzSX7vi8wfvN/VQx1uf8/HlDoE5fiNNfqTM/tyeu7p2oRT tgVGNuQSAqnT8Lr2hUExETHoS1lXJsyIuhxgDdEStROgexIWYDNflD5n2Z8/6aOl cQ3UTsIY56+K2td5br3BX96RzuTniYNMSl4q1Q5QGsePwhLQBM++72txx3qhVKJY FVn02bBGIqKd4vyVEJ0mCn8oLgv/PAGtP5Xjp3sZ92+kHyLVPvoFR7Wtc/sJyICy zzR1Y1UW5STSJKqs9BvHbydpCzEFQ/8ulix8F6GlLeGJNfqDoWow0NSPOuWkxA8x /3+oEbg81IeqFC0/98hnxmslJ9yxy07Q9JF9s5kNtT6c6ZJJmRK/xnQItrMqR1H3 Lcs+RmlKm8D3N0Lfb/+h =tEmQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig823A3CD30027C9D3E2467A1F-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from multi.imgtec.com ([194.200.65.239]:52746 "EHLO multi.imgtec.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755183Ab3AKNSJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jan 2013 08:18:09 -0500 Message-ID: <50F010AA.2010708@imgtec.com> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 13:16:26 +0000 From: James Hogan MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/44] Meta Linux Kernel Port References: <1357831872-29451-1-git-send-email-james.hogan@imgtec.com> <20130111103442.b80ddbfb11ef322ed28ca3b3@canb.auug.org.au> <50EFD824.3010502@imgtec.com> <20130112000336.1f24c42237fab4fe0c305ff6@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20130112000336.1f24c42237fab4fe0c305ff6@canb.auug.org.au> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig823A3CD30027C9D3E2467A1F" Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20130111131626.AuXO-jsAFbHXIO2hNkvp-315P6l3KMnhKNSV8N7dgqk@z> --------------enig823A3CD30027C9D3E2467A1F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Stephen, On 11/01/13 13:03, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 09:15:16 +0000 James Hogan = wrote: >> >> On 10/01/13 23:34, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> You really should not base development work on linux-next and before = I >>> can include it there you will need to rebase it onto Linus' tree (or = some >>> other tree that does not rebase). Its OK to test by doing a merge wi= th >>> linux-next ... >> >> Thanks for the info Stephen. So I suppose if the patchset depended on >> things in -next the normal way to do it would be to merge in the >> individual trees I needed first? >=20 > Yep, but please let the maintainers of those trees know that you expect= > their tree to not be rebased. Or, if if they aren't really dependencie= s > just conflicts, then leave the other tree out and let me and Linus fix > the conflicts when we merge your tree. >=20 Okay, thanks. Due to the recent merge window the dependencies are trivial at the moment, and it wouldn't introduce build breakage to exclude them (i.e. it's just removing selects from Kconfig files and defconfigs that have been removed in linux-next), so I'll exclude those changes for now and deal with them later. Cheers James --------------enig823A3CD30027C9D3E2467A1F Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQ8BC8AAoJEKHZs+irPybfYfAP/jY3PVHNZdb4SHsvUII13uIR /8mhNdpuIMMWSKHdXwCsu/A/AhbjIT77ubwtIQoZgfI6d3RIdzEKV3eyr0UcP0lW JwG++P1wuSLSQTu9/pZVLR7LJsydFj2qsyQhnBNt1ApdjrkoEW+0nDrSfk6Wy0vY 5Wb0hSLft/CZRa5iWcXBt5JEI0VWPXwQBOXanrEfGCGFk97yB1Ysjj24PjJXaeJG 6/Ue3Dns2abEK1O+anzbYT/BrHEo9C+LtcxooNgD9G4NfjoNgJ+ZAFq1xRdmicqQ 19/wg99m7HfSLcf+GQhzSX7vi8wfvN/VQx1uf8/HlDoE5fiNNfqTM/tyeu7p2oRT tgVGNuQSAqnT8Lr2hUExETHoS1lXJsyIuhxgDdEStROgexIWYDNflD5n2Z8/6aOl cQ3UTsIY56+K2td5br3BX96RzuTniYNMSl4q1Q5QGsePwhLQBM++72txx3qhVKJY FVn02bBGIqKd4vyVEJ0mCn8oLgv/PAGtP5Xjp3sZ92+kHyLVPvoFR7Wtc/sJyICy zzR1Y1UW5STSJKqs9BvHbydpCzEFQ/8ulix8F6GlLeGJNfqDoWow0NSPOuWkxA8x /3+oEbg81IeqFC0/98hnxmslJ9yxy07Q9JF9s5kNtT6c6ZJJmRK/xnQItrMqR1H3 Lcs+RmlKm8D3N0Lfb/+h =tEmQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig823A3CD30027C9D3E2467A1F--