Re: [PATCH v3 00/44] Meta Linux Kernel Port

[James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1184 bytes --]

Hi,

On 11/01/13 13:03, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 09:15:16 +0000 James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 10/01/13 23:34, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> You really should not base development work on linux-next and before I
>>> can include it there you will need to rebase it onto Linus' tree (or some
>>> other tree that does not rebase).  Its OK to test by doing a merge with
>>> linux-next ...
>>
>> Thanks for the info Stephen. So I suppose if the patchset depended on
>> things in -next the normal way to do it would be to merge in the
>> individual trees I needed first?
> 
> Yep, but please let the maintainers of those trees know that you expect
> their tree to not be rebased.  Or, if if they aren't really dependencies
> just conflicts, then leave the other tree out and let me and Linus fix
> the conflicts when we merge your tree.
> 

Okay, I've rebased the metag tree from linux-next onto the master branch
of Al's signal tree (to get Vineet's GENERIC_SIGALTSTACK fix and
GENERIC_SIGALTSTACK's eventual removal).

git://github.com/jahogan/metag-linux.git
branch: metag-core
tag: metag-core-v3.1

Cheers
James


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]