From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Hogan Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/44] Meta Linux Kernel Port Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 15:02:06 +0000 Message-ID: <50F0296E.2000704@imgtec.com> References: <1357831872-29451-1-git-send-email-james.hogan@imgtec.com> <20130111103442.b80ddbfb11ef322ed28ca3b3@canb.auug.org.au> <50EFD824.3010502@imgtec.com> <20130112000336.1f24c42237fab4fe0c305ff6@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigAEBAD9ED7F3CBF3A8415926C" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130112000336.1f24c42237fab4fe0c305ff6@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Viro List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org --------------enigAEBAD9ED7F3CBF3A8415926C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On 11/01/13 13:03, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 09:15:16 +0000 James Hogan = wrote: >> >> On 10/01/13 23:34, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> You really should not base development work on linux-next and before = I >>> can include it there you will need to rebase it onto Linus' tree (or = some >>> other tree that does not rebase). Its OK to test by doing a merge wi= th >>> linux-next ... >> >> Thanks for the info Stephen. So I suppose if the patchset depended on >> things in -next the normal way to do it would be to merge in the >> individual trees I needed first? >=20 > Yep, but please let the maintainers of those trees know that you expect= > their tree to not be rebased. Or, if if they aren't really dependencie= s > just conflicts, then leave the other tree out and let me and Linus fix > the conflicts when we merge your tree. >=20 Okay, I've rebased the metag tree from linux-next onto the master branch of Al's signal tree (to get Vineet's GENERIC_SIGALTSTACK fix and GENERIC_SIGALTSTACK's eventual removal). git://github.com/jahogan/metag-linux.git branch: metag-core tag: metag-core-v3.1 Cheers James --------------enigAEBAD9ED7F3CBF3A8415926C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQ8Cl0AAoJEKHZs+irPybf2hAP/AiKST0JbqNY2uCwBakkFyIt iwsqU7B5RZG1R9ExEdyGE69V8PK3FS1OMt3cja5G8bppsopjzcHR1mW/r0hJ4rlu hZ25+yABlZUxctmxIsxXzcerNLQ/Fd7IUjpOEMlroR/7o2UooF1C0wykVgMcB0za B1DUQlArTtYKthYDtzMeXEHgrBWM6yRy0tbnDLZB9eJgbvxET9mL6X95tnJxwrjD UDA0bbOyleJa5LyGsx6+L2RCgvgbxc4Ys77PvnSU52Tzs0qdIxqhyblsiuNRPGyq SPC+MxvCZRrq66EG6yDLQcVhyZXLj56GvseLE2NsTqIgmzUGz7uDDIXRiM/xP7N8 pdNBJUlKwvkR4ztbScS2oUYuzzqf7xhodCbNVM6Jdp82uLOXbrISgYiXkJ/5UDIi M7PQa70DKuaZtXUYaSxvIw0DH3zyQCaSg/M0y7ivfo+AuO2MHFpaZQapY6uoxKCA n+YIJAg07/lpw26SWqAWrKCiyHNUB4y6A1I1INOADMIbxOLzBNzVPVRuqdRysLQj cWozwOWQ/zA2RDoJ5cHe65CAqEyNn1DkiZR96OaCoST3X+oEahuwTV2G3E431gZa JBJu2lLsHlUuxgcn7PaYwo0dzLNvfHJr/nxIO2r2DAmPIhgArTmPw+GXp92g/RaY yMYaEhJWnMSupoG3zHi2 =vMXK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigAEBAD9ED7F3CBF3A8415926C-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from multi.imgtec.com ([194.200.65.239]:56755 "EHLO multi.imgtec.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753787Ab3AKPCP (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jan 2013 10:02:15 -0500 Message-ID: <50F0296E.2000704@imgtec.com> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 15:02:06 +0000 From: James Hogan MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/44] Meta Linux Kernel Port References: <1357831872-29451-1-git-send-email-james.hogan@imgtec.com> <20130111103442.b80ddbfb11ef322ed28ca3b3@canb.auug.org.au> <50EFD824.3010502@imgtec.com> <20130112000336.1f24c42237fab4fe0c305ff6@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20130112000336.1f24c42237fab4fe0c305ff6@canb.auug.org.au> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigAEBAD9ED7F3CBF3A8415926C" Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Viro Message-ID: <20130111150206.0TlUuxyXz_udvtQhEewPtoblx6jnkSDPxUN_SIwT1l8@z> --------------enigAEBAD9ED7F3CBF3A8415926C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On 11/01/13 13:03, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 09:15:16 +0000 James Hogan = wrote: >> >> On 10/01/13 23:34, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> You really should not base development work on linux-next and before = I >>> can include it there you will need to rebase it onto Linus' tree (or = some >>> other tree that does not rebase). Its OK to test by doing a merge wi= th >>> linux-next ... >> >> Thanks for the info Stephen. So I suppose if the patchset depended on >> things in -next the normal way to do it would be to merge in the >> individual trees I needed first? >=20 > Yep, but please let the maintainers of those trees know that you expect= > their tree to not be rebased. Or, if if they aren't really dependencie= s > just conflicts, then leave the other tree out and let me and Linus fix > the conflicts when we merge your tree. >=20 Okay, I've rebased the metag tree from linux-next onto the master branch of Al's signal tree (to get Vineet's GENERIC_SIGALTSTACK fix and GENERIC_SIGALTSTACK's eventual removal). git://github.com/jahogan/metag-linux.git branch: metag-core tag: metag-core-v3.1 Cheers James --------------enigAEBAD9ED7F3CBF3A8415926C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQ8Cl0AAoJEKHZs+irPybf2hAP/AiKST0JbqNY2uCwBakkFyIt iwsqU7B5RZG1R9ExEdyGE69V8PK3FS1OMt3cja5G8bppsopjzcHR1mW/r0hJ4rlu hZ25+yABlZUxctmxIsxXzcerNLQ/Fd7IUjpOEMlroR/7o2UooF1C0wykVgMcB0za B1DUQlArTtYKthYDtzMeXEHgrBWM6yRy0tbnDLZB9eJgbvxET9mL6X95tnJxwrjD UDA0bbOyleJa5LyGsx6+L2RCgvgbxc4Ys77PvnSU52Tzs0qdIxqhyblsiuNRPGyq SPC+MxvCZRrq66EG6yDLQcVhyZXLj56GvseLE2NsTqIgmzUGz7uDDIXRiM/xP7N8 pdNBJUlKwvkR4ztbScS2oUYuzzqf7xhodCbNVM6Jdp82uLOXbrISgYiXkJ/5UDIi M7PQa70DKuaZtXUYaSxvIw0DH3zyQCaSg/M0y7ivfo+AuO2MHFpaZQapY6uoxKCA n+YIJAg07/lpw26SWqAWrKCiyHNUB4y6A1I1INOADMIbxOLzBNzVPVRuqdRysLQj cWozwOWQ/zA2RDoJ5cHe65CAqEyNn1DkiZR96OaCoST3X+oEahuwTV2G3E431gZa JBJu2lLsHlUuxgcn7PaYwo0dzLNvfHJr/nxIO2r2DAmPIhgArTmPw+GXp92g/RaY yMYaEhJWnMSupoG3zHi2 =vMXK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigAEBAD9ED7F3CBF3A8415926C--