From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vineet Gupta Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 29/76] ARC: Boot #1: low-level, setup_arch(), /proc/cpuinfo, mem init Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 14:01:42 +0530 Message-ID: <50FE4E6E.3090708@synopsys.com> References: <1358511930-7424-1-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com> <201301181445.39050.arnd@arndb.de> <50FE4497.3050306@synopsys.com> <201301220823.44872.arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from alvesta.synopsys.com ([198.182.60.77]:50548 "EHLO alvesta.synopsys.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753864Ab3AVIbz (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jan 2013 03:31:55 -0500 In-Reply-To: <201301220823.44872.arnd@arndb.de> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 22 January 2013 01:53 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 22 January 2013, Vineet Gupta wrote: >> How does the following look like. This is RFC only and I'll squash it into Boot #1 >> patch. >> >> From: Vineet Gupta >> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 13:03:50 +0530 >> Subject: [PATCH] RFC: Convert ARC port from bootmem to memblock >> >> Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta >> --- > > Looks good to me, although I might be missing some details. > > Given that everything still seems to work for you, > > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann > > on the combined patch. > I haven't done heavy testing on this (just basic boot) and no_bootmem/memblock is not a well-known turf form me yet. But should be sufficient for now ;-) Thx, -Vineet