From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Hogan Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/44] Meta Linux Kernel Port Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 11:35:09 +0000 Message-ID: <50FE796D.5070608@imgtec.com> References: <1357831872-29451-1-git-send-email-james.hogan@imgtec.com> <20130111103442.b80ddbfb11ef322ed28ca3b3@canb.auug.org.au> <50EFD824.3010502@imgtec.com> <20130112000336.1f24c42237fab4fe0c305ff6@canb.auug.org.au> <50F0296E.2000704@imgtec.com> <20130112120957.36df3412c9d6cca089a0340a@canb.auug.org.au> <20130112095507.GA1738@balrog> <20130119055501.GA2802@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130119055501.GA2802@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Al Viro Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On 19/01/13 05:55, Al Viro wrote: > On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 09:55:07AM +0000, James Hogan wrote: >> Hi Stephen, Al, >> >> On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 12:09:57PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 15:02:06 +0000 James Hogan wrote: >>>> >>>> Okay, I've rebased the metag tree from linux-next onto the master branch >>>> of Al's signal tree (to get Vineet's GENERIC_SIGALTSTACK fix and >>>> GENERIC_SIGALTSTACK's eventual removal). >>> >>> OK, but I hope you mentioned not rebasing to Al. >> >> I'm still rebasing the metag tree, and it's not quite ready for -next so >> I don't mind if Al's tree rebases at this stage tbh. >> >> Al: I don't know if you normally rebase your tree, but if it's okay with >> you I'll let you know when I need it not to be rebased. > > Umm... > 1) #master is definitely bad for base; #for-linus is much safer (and > sufficient for your case) Thanks for that, and I see it's now merged into Linus' tree so I'll rebase onto that instead. Cheers James From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from multi.imgtec.com ([194.200.65.239]:2174 "EHLO multi.imgtec.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752747Ab3AVLfP (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jan 2013 06:35:15 -0500 Message-ID: <50FE796D.5070608@imgtec.com> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 11:35:09 +0000 From: James Hogan MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/44] Meta Linux Kernel Port References: <1357831872-29451-1-git-send-email-james.hogan@imgtec.com> <20130111103442.b80ddbfb11ef322ed28ca3b3@canb.auug.org.au> <50EFD824.3010502@imgtec.com> <20130112000336.1f24c42237fab4fe0c305ff6@canb.auug.org.au> <50F0296E.2000704@imgtec.com> <20130112120957.36df3412c9d6cca089a0340a@canb.auug.org.au> <20130112095507.GA1738@balrog> <20130119055501.GA2802@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20130119055501.GA2802@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Al Viro Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20130122113509.F7zCqQV32SsiWMDTauRlEeLURUZZBrZGvd9ARF_668g@z> On 19/01/13 05:55, Al Viro wrote: > On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 09:55:07AM +0000, James Hogan wrote: >> Hi Stephen, Al, >> >> On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 12:09:57PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 15:02:06 +0000 James Hogan wrote: >>>> >>>> Okay, I've rebased the metag tree from linux-next onto the master branch >>>> of Al's signal tree (to get Vineet's GENERIC_SIGALTSTACK fix and >>>> GENERIC_SIGALTSTACK's eventual removal). >>> >>> OK, but I hope you mentioned not rebasing to Al. >> >> I'm still rebasing the metag tree, and it's not quite ready for -next so >> I don't mind if Al's tree rebases at this stage tbh. >> >> Al: I don't know if you normally rebase your tree, but if it's okay with >> you I'll let you know when I need it not to be rebased. > > Umm... > 1) #master is definitely bad for base; #for-linus is much safer (and > sufficient for your case) Thanks for that, and I see it's now merged into Linus' tree so I'll rebase onto that instead. Cheers James