From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vineet Gupta Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/76] Synopsys ARC Linux kernel Port Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 15:41:05 +0530 Message-ID: <510108B9.3020205@synopsys.com> References: <1358511930-7424-1-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com> <201301181512.14441.arnd@arndb.de> <5100F6AD.5050001@synopsys.com> <51010461.20604@imgtec.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from us02smtp1.synopsys.com ([198.182.60.75]:46971 "EHLO vaxjo.synopsys.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752923Ab3AXKMv (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jan 2013 05:12:51 -0500 In-Reply-To: <51010461.20604@imgtec.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: James Hogan Cc: Arnd Bergmann , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Rothwell On Thursday 24 January 2013 03:22 PM, James Hogan wrote: > Hi Vineet, > > On 24/01/13 08:54, Vineet Gupta wrote: >> (3) That branch will be ARC patches on top of Linus's 3.8 rc4. Actually for my >> development, I'd also cherry picked a few patches from linux-next (soft and hard >> dependencies from several different *next trees) - hard ones being >> >> f13a366 CONFIG_GENERIC_SIGALTSTACK build breakage with asm-generic/syscalls.h [Al] > FYI this one has now been merged into Linus' master. > > Cheers > James > OK thanks - but I'd rather have the patches based on a well known checkpoint - so maybe wait for next rc. Any ideas about other questions on the thread - given that several next trees are still involved. metag doesn't seem to be on linux-next yet ? -Vineet