From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vineet Gupta Subject: Re: pt_regs leak into userspace (was Re: [PATCH v3 20/71] ARC: Signal handling) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 18:38:58 +0530 Message-ID: <5118ED6A.3050809@synopsys.com> References: <1359024639-21915-1-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com> <1359024639-21915-9-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com> <51189D2F.4030000@synopsys.com> <5118C458.2070205@synopsys.com> <5118C7B6.6040807@imgtec.com> <5118D478.3010205@synopsys.com> <5118E60E.5060606@synopsys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from us02smtp1.synopsys.com ([198.182.60.75]:50833 "EHLO vaxjo.synopsys.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757146Ab3BKNJN (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Feb 2013 08:09:13 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Jonas Bonn Cc: James Hogan , Arnd Bergmann , "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Al Viro On Monday 11 February 2013 06:32 PM, Jonas Bonn wrote: > On 11 February 2013 13:37, Vineet Gupta wrote: >> Anyhow going back to my orig patch - if we park the >> callee-regs-in-sigcontext-or-not, other bits look OK ? >> > Aside from the callee-regs question (which I hope somebody more > knowledgeable can chime in on): Acked-by: Jonas Bonn > Thx. As I mentioned, this patch will needed to be chopped and squashed into several existing commits. I presume I'll add the Ack to "ARC: Fundamental ARCH data-types/defines" which contains the initial def of ptrace.h -Vineet