From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: SYSV IPC broken for no-legacy syscall kernels (was Re: [RFC PATCH v1 26/31] ARC: Build system: Makefiles, Kconfig, Linker script)
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 17:59:33 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <513DCE2D.6010800@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201211071413.49178.arnd@arndb.de>
Hi Arnd,
On Wednesday 07 November 2012 07:43 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 November 2012, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>
>> +
>> +config ARC
>> + def_bool y
>> + select ARCH_WANT_IPC_PARSE_VERSION
>> + # ARC Busybox based initramfs absolutely relies on DEVTMPFS for /dev
>> + # DEVTMPS in turn needs HOTPLUG
>> + select DEVTMPFS if !INITRAMFS_SOURCE=""
>> + select GENERIC_ATOMIC64
>> + select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
>> + select GENERIC_FIND_FIRST_BIT
>> + # for now, we don't need GENERIC_IRQ_PROBE, CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP
>> + select GENERIC_IRQ_SHOW
>> + select GENERIC_PENDING_IRQ if SMP
>> + select GENERIC_SMP_IDLE_THREAD
>> + select HAVE_GENERIC_HARDIRQS
>> + select HOTPLUG if !INITRAMFS_SOURCE=""
>> + select MODULES_USE_ELF_RELA
> You should not need ARCH_WANT_IPC_PARSE_VERSION
It seems, we have a small bug in sysV IPC.
A lot of LTP tests have started failing on ARC 3.9-rc1 kernel due to absence of
ARCH_WANT_IPC_PARSE_VERSION.
I'm assuming that for newer arches, msgctl(2) and friends need to have need to
have @cmd of type 0x01nn where 0x0100 is IPC_64.
However for ! ARCH_WANT_IPC_PARSE_VERSION, ipc/util.h seems to be defining a dummy
version of ipc_parse_version(), which doesn't strip out the 0x0100 from @cmds,
causing the code to not enter the switch block in SYSCALL_DEFINE3(msgctl) making
it fail.
Adding the above item to arch/arc/Kconfig obviously fixes the breakage.
It seems there is some bogosity in the way ipc_parse_version() is defined. Given
the way it is used, to strip out the 0x0100 bit, it seems we always need the
function variant - the IA-64 ish comment in there seems to be bit-rot.
What do you think ?
-Vineet
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-11 12:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 146+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-07 9:47 [RFC Patch v1 00/31] Synopsys ARC Linux kernel Port Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 9:47 ` Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 9:47 ` [RFC PATCH v1 01/31] ARC: Generic Headers Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 9:47 ` Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 9:47 ` [RFC PATCH v1 02/31] ARC: irqflags Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 9:47 ` Vineet Gupta
2012-11-12 19:50 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-11-12 19:50 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-01-01 7:44 ` Vineet Gupta
2013-01-01 7:44 ` Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 9:47 ` [RFC PATCH v1 03/31] ARC: atomic/bitops/cmpxchg/barriers Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 9:47 ` Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 9:47 ` [RFC PATCH v1 04/31] asm-generic headers: uaccess.h to conditionally define segment_eq() Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 9:47 ` Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 9:47 ` [RFC PATCH v1 05/31] ARC: uaccess friends Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 9:47 ` [RFC PATCH v1 06/31] asm-generic headers: Allow yet more arch overrides in checksum.h Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 9:47 ` Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 9:47 ` [RFC PATCH v1 07/31] ARC: checksum/byteorder/swab routines Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 9:47 ` Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 9:47 ` [RFC PATCH v1 08/31] ARC: Fundamental ARCH data-types/defines Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 9:47 ` Vineet Gupta
2012-11-08 7:10 ` Jonas Bonn
2012-11-08 18:52 ` Vineet Gupta
2012-11-08 20:36 ` Jonas Bonn
2012-11-12 13:58 ` Vineet Gupta
2012-11-12 14:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-11-07 9:47 ` [RFC PATCH v1 09/31] ARC: spinlock/rwlock/mutex primitives Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 9:47 ` Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 9:47 ` [RFC PATCH v1 10/31] ARC: string library Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 9:47 ` Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 9:47 ` [RFC PATCH v1 11/31] ARC: Low level IRQ/Trap/Exception(non-MMU) Handling Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 9:47 ` Vineet Gupta
2012-11-16 4:58 ` Al Viro
2012-11-16 4:58 ` Al Viro
2012-12-27 9:00 ` Vineet Gupta
2012-12-27 13:29 ` Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 9:47 ` [RFC PATCH v1 12/31] ARC: Interrupt Handling Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 9:47 ` Vineet Gupta
2012-11-12 20:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-11-12 20:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-01-01 10:46 ` Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 9:47 ` [RFC PATCH v1 13/31] ARC: Non-MMU Exception Handling Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 9:47 ` Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 9:47 ` [RFC PATCH v1 14/31] ARC: syscall support Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 9:47 ` Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 14:21 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-11-09 9:50 ` James Hogan
2012-11-13 11:41 ` James Hogan
2012-11-13 12:01 ` Jonas Bonn
2012-11-13 12:01 ` Jonas Bonn
2012-11-13 12:11 ` James Hogan
2012-11-14 12:23 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-11-14 12:31 ` James Hogan
2012-11-13 10:13 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2012-11-13 10:37 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-11-15 6:15 ` Vineet Gupta
2012-11-15 6:15 ` Vineet Gupta
2012-11-15 12:35 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-17 5:13 ` Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 9:47 ` [RFC PATCH v1 15/31] ARC: Process/scheduling/clock/Timers/Delay Management Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 9:47 ` Vineet Gupta
2012-11-12 20:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-01-02 7:13 ` Vineet Gupta
2013-01-02 8:45 ` Vineet Gupta
2013-01-04 13:01 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-11-07 9:47 ` [RFC PATCH v1 16/31] ARC: Signal handling Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 9:47 ` Vineet Gupta
2012-11-16 5:26 ` Al Viro
2012-12-28 12:34 ` Vineet Gupta
2012-12-28 12:34 ` Vineet Gupta
2012-12-28 12:42 ` [PATCH 1/2] ARC: [Review] Preparing to fix incorrect syscall restarts due to signals Vineet Gupta
2012-12-28 12:42 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARC: [Review] Prevent incorrect syscall restarts Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 9:47 ` [RFC PATCH v1 17/31] ARC: Cache Flush Management Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 9:47 ` Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 9:47 ` [RFC PATCH v1 18/31] ARC: Page Table Management Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 9:47 ` Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 9:47 ` [RFC PATCH v1 19/31] ARC: MMU Context Management Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 9:47 ` Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 9:47 ` [RFC PATCH v1 20/31] ARC: MMU Exception Handling Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 9:47 ` [RFC PATCH v1 21/31] ARC: TLB flush Handling Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 9:47 ` Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 9:47 ` [RFC PATCH v1 22/31] ARC: Page Fault handling (incl uaccess fixup) Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 9:47 ` Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 9:47 ` [RFC PATCH v1 23/31] ARC: I/O and DMA Mappings Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 9:47 ` Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 9:47 ` [RFC PATCH v1 24/31] ARC: startup #1: low-level, setup_arch(), /proc/cpuinfo, mem init Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 9:47 ` [RFC PATCH v1 25/31] ARC: [plat-arcfpga] Hooking up platform to ARC UART Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 9:47 ` Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 14:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-11-07 14:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-07 13:10 ` Vineet Gupta
2013-01-07 13:46 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-07 14:04 ` Vineet Gupta
2013-01-07 14:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-14 7:35 ` early init dt for earlyprintk (was Re: [RFC PATCH v1 25/31] ARC: [plat-arcfpga] Hooking up platform to ARC UART) Vineet Gupta
2013-01-14 9:48 ` James Hogan
2013-01-14 10:09 ` Vineet Gupta
2013-01-14 10:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-17 7:29 ` [RFC PATCH v1 25/31] ARC: [plat-arcfpga] Hooking up platform to ARC UART Vineet Gupta
2013-01-17 10:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-11-07 9:47 ` [RFC PATCH v1 26/31] ARC: Build system: Makefiles, Kconfig, Linker script Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 14:13 ` Arnd Bergmann
[not found] ` <50E4449A.7010606@synopsys.com>
[not found] ` <201301021448.20119.arnd@arndb.de>
2013-01-03 7:58 ` Vineet Gupta
2013-01-03 8:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-03 8:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-03-11 12:29 ` Vineet Gupta [this message]
2013-03-11 12:44 ` SYSV IPC broken for no-legacy syscall kernels (was Re: [RFC PATCH v1 26/31] ARC: Build system: Makefiles, Kconfig, Linker script) James Hogan
2013-03-11 12:56 ` Vineet Gupta
2013-03-11 13:07 ` James Hogan
2013-03-11 13:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-03-11 13:48 ` Vineet Gupta
2013-03-11 13:48 ` Vineet Gupta
2013-03-11 14:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-11-15 17:49 ` [RFC PATCH v1 26/31] ARC: Build system: Makefiles, Kconfig, Linker script James Hogan
2012-11-15 17:49 ` James Hogan
2012-11-15 19:30 ` Ralf Baechle
2012-11-16 6:36 ` Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 9:47 ` [RFC PATCH v1 27/31] ARC: Last bits (stubs) to get to a running kernel with UART Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 9:47 ` Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 9:47 ` [RFC PATCH v1 28/31] ARC: split ret_from_fork, simplify kernel_thread() Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 9:47 ` Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 9:47 ` [RFC PATCH v1 29/31] ARC: switch to generic kernel_thread() Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 9:47 ` Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 9:47 ` [RFC PATCH v1 30/31] ARC: switch to generic kernel_execve() and sys_execve() Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 9:47 ` Vineet Gupta
2012-11-16 4:08 ` Al Viro
2012-11-16 4:08 ` Al Viro
2012-11-17 14:01 ` Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 9:47 ` [RFC PATCH v1 31/31] ARC: [plat-arcfpga] defconfig Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 9:47 ` Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 14:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-11-12 14:18 ` James Hogan
2012-11-12 14:21 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-11-07 14:36 ` [RFC Patch v1 00/31] Synopsys ARC Linux kernel Port Arnd Bergmann
2012-11-08 19:09 ` Vineet Gupta
2012-11-07 20:46 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2012-11-07 20:46 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2012-11-20 13:47 ` Pavel Machek
2012-11-20 13:49 ` Vineet Gupta
2012-11-20 13:59 ` Pavel Machek
2012-11-20 14:17 ` Vineet Gupta
2013-01-18 19:46 ` Pavel Machek
2013-01-18 22:17 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-19 10:15 ` Pavel Machek
2013-01-19 12:32 ` Vineet Gupta
2013-01-19 17:02 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=513DCE2D.6010800@synopsys.com \
--to=vineet.gupta1@synopsys.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).