From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" Subject: Re: [patch 31/34] tile: Use generic idle loop Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 21:11:36 +0530 Message-ID: <515464B0.8080704@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20130321214930.752934102@linutronix.de> <20130321215235.348460344@linutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from e28smtp06.in.ibm.com ([122.248.162.6]:33693 "EHLO e28smtp06.in.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755479Ab3C1PoF (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Mar 2013 11:44:05 -0400 Received: from /spool/local by e28smtp06.in.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 21:09:46 +0530 In-Reply-To: <20130321215235.348460344@linutronix.de> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: LKML , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Rusty Russell , Paul McKenney , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Magnus Damm , Chris Metcalf On 03/22/2013 03:23 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner > Cc: Chris Metcalf > --- > arch/tile/kernel/process.c | 61 ++++----------------------------------------- > arch/tile/kernel/smpboot.c | 2 - > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-) > > Index: linux-2.6/arch/tile/kernel/process.c > =================================================================== > --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/tile/kernel/process.c > +++ linux-2.6/arch/tile/kernel/process.c > @@ -40,13 +40,11 @@ > #include > #include > > - > /* > * Use the (x86) "idle=poll" option to prefer low latency when leaving the > * idle loop over low power while in the idle loop, e.g. if we have > * one thread per core and we want to get threads out of futex waits fast. > */ > -static int no_idle_nap; > static int __init idle_setup(char *str) > { > if (!str) > @@ -54,64 +52,17 @@ static int __init idle_setup(char *str) > > if (!strcmp(str, "poll")) { > pr_info("using polling idle threads.\n"); > - no_idle_nap = 1; > + cpu_idle_poll_ctrl(true); > } else if (!strcmp(str, "halt")) > - no_idle_nap = 0; > - else > - return -1; > - > - return 0; > + return 0; > + return -1; > } > early_param("idle", idle_setup); > That doesn't look quite right, since it returns -1 (instead of 0) when str == poll. Regards, Srivatsa S. Bhat