From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vineet Gupta Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] remove GENERIC_GPIO Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 19:35:37 +0530 Message-ID: <5166C331.7060404@synopsys.com> References: <1365445950-5736-1-git-send-email-gnurou@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from us01smtp3.synopsys.com ([198.182.44.81]:44886 "EHLO hermes.synopsys.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751464Ab3DKOF4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Apr 2013 10:05:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1365445950-5736-1-git-send-email-gnurou@gmail.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Alexandre Courbot Cc: Grant Likely , Linus Walleij , Arnd Bergmann , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Alexandre Courbot , "christian.ruppert@abilis.com" , Pierrick Hascoet , sascha leuenberger Hi Alexandre, On 04/09/2013 12:02 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > From: Alexandre Courbot > > Second version, based on -next this time, of the GENERIC_GPIO removal patches. > Considering there is only a short amount of time before 3.10 merge window opens, > I hope this version will be considered for inclusion, otherwise we'd end up > with an half-baked removal or I will have to rebase everything for 3.11. :( > > Grant, if this is ok with you, how shall we have this integrated into your > branch? Half of this has been tested in my -next branch, and the present patches > make the next half, should I resend you the whole series based on -next and > withdraw my branch? This is a fast moving target, so we should try and shoot > that duck as soon as we can! :) > > Changes from v1: > * Rebased on -next > * Added Chinese documentation update from Chen Baozi > > Alexandre Courbot (3): > gpio: convert selectors of GENERIC_GPIO to GPIOLIB > gpio: remove GENERIC_GPIO config option > gpio: rename CONFIG_GPIOLIB to CONFIG_GPIO > I'm the maintainer for arch/arc. For 3.10, we are going to have a sub-platform included which enables GPIO. However given that your patch is still not in a maintainer tree I'm going to apply the platform patch with GENERIC_GPIO and it would show up in -next as well. But don't be alarmed - to align with your work, Christian or you can then possibly apply a patch to make arch/arc/* confirm to your work - preferably via your tree/patchseries - OK ? Thx, -Vineet