From: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>
To: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
linux390@de.ibm.com, cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com,
mtosatti@redhat.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch: s390: kernel: reset 'c->hotpluggable' when failure occurs
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 17:31:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51C9636F.1050709@asianux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130625090928.GA8981@osiris>
On 06/25/2013 05:09 PM, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 03:24:09PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
>> On 06/25/2013 02:48 PM, Heiko Carstens wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 09:46:45AM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
>>>>> When smp_add_present_cpu() fails, it has reset all things excluding
>>>>> 'c->hotpluggable', so need reset it as original state completely.
>>>>>
>>>>> + c->hotpluggable = 0;
>>>>> return rc;
>>> No, that doesn't make sense. All cpus on s390 are always hotplugable.
>>> It really doesn't matter if the value of this field is 0 or 1 after
>>> an error.
>>>
>>
>> If so, is it better to set 'c->hotpluggable' for all cpus on s390 during
>> initializing ?
>
> No, just leave the code as it is.
>
Currently we have 3 possible states for 'struct cpu':
initialized, and set hotplugable.
unitialized, and set hotplugable.
unitialized, and unset hotplugable.
Either 2nd or 3rd is inconsistent.
The cpu_is_hotplugable() will be used in kernel/rcutorture.c. I do not
know whether it will cause issue or not, but it seems dangerous when
__smp_rescan_cpus() has already called, and has some unsucessfull call
of smp_add_present_cpu().
Please help check.
Thanks.
--
Chen Gang
Asianux Corporation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-25 9:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-25 1:46 [PATCH] arch: s390: kernel: reset 'c->hotpluggable' when failure occurs Chen Gang
2013-06-25 1:46 ` Chen Gang
2013-06-25 1:54 ` [Suggestion] arch: s390: mm: the warnings with allmodconfig and "EXTRA_CFLAGS=-W" Chen Gang
2013-06-25 1:54 ` Chen Gang
2013-06-25 6:50 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2013-06-25 6:50 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2013-06-25 7:25 ` Chen Gang
2013-06-25 6:48 ` [PATCH] arch: s390: kernel: reset 'c->hotpluggable' when failure occurs Heiko Carstens
2013-06-25 7:24 ` Chen Gang
2013-06-25 9:09 ` Heiko Carstens
2013-06-25 9:31 ` Chen Gang [this message]
2013-06-26 1:44 ` Chen Gang
2013-06-27 2:43 ` [PATCH v2] arch: s390: kernel: scan all present cpu forcely Chen Gang
2013-06-27 8:18 ` Heiko Carstens
2013-06-27 9:22 ` Chen Gang
2013-06-28 1:23 ` [PATCH] include/linux/interrupt.h: add dummy irq_set_irq_wake() for "!GENERIC_HARDIRQS" Chen Gang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51C9636F.1050709@asianux.com \
--to=gang.chen@asianux.com \
--cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux390@de.ibm.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).