linux-arch.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Frantisek Hrbata <fhrbata@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jstancek@redhat.com,
	keescook@chromium.org,
	Christophe Guillon <christophe.guillon@st.com>,
	rusty@rustcorp.com.au, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de,
	mgahagan@redhat.com, agospoda@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] add support for gcov format introduced in gcc 4.7
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 13:57:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <521B428F.6020801@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130823161532.GA2336@localhost.localdomain>

On 23.08.2013 18:15, Frantisek Hrbata wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 05:08:07PM +0200, Peter Oberparleiter wrote:
>> Most of your code looks very familiar. There's one feature missing though
>> that Christophe brought up as a requirement: the ability for gcov-kernel
>> to cope with kernel modules being compiled with GCC versions implementing
>> a different gcov format (apparently this can happen in some embedded
>> setups).
> 
> Here follows quote from the gcc/gcov-io.h file
> 
> <quote>
> Coverage information is held in two files.  A notes file, which is
> generated by the compiler, and a data file, which is generated by
> the program under test.  Both files use a similar structure.  We do
> not attempt to make these files backwards compatible with previous
> versions, as you only need coverage information when developing a
> program.  We do hold version information, so that mismatches can be
> detected, and we use a format that allows tools to skip information
> they do not understand or are not interested in.
> </quote>
> 
> Also from my experience, I would expect that the gcov will be used during
> development, meaning re-compilation isn't a big problem here. I for sure can be
> missing something and I'm by no means saying it wouldn't be useful feature. Just
> that it would complite things a little bit.

Here's the info I got from Christophe when we last discussed this feature:
"The main issue is compilation of modules with a different
compiler from the kernel. It is a quite common situation in embedded
Linuxes, as modules can be published far after the core kernel, thus
for our use it is a good feature."

I'd say that if we can support that setup with manageable extra effort,
it would be worth it.

>> Christophe proposed run-time version checking and a file-ops type function
>> table which is chosen based on info->version. I found this approach
>> somewhat intrusive and this would also not have covered the case where a
>> new GCC versions was used to compile kernel modules for which the base
>> kernel has no support. I tried to solve this requirement by combining
>> two changes:
>>
>> 1) make the gcov-format generated by gcov-kernel compile-time configurable
>> 2) separate the gcov-format specific code into a loadable kernel module
> 
> So if I understand it correctly you would separate the input
> format(gcov_info) from the output(gcda files). Meaning no matter which gcc
> compiled the module you can select the gcda format. And even if the kernel does
> not know the new format you can simply compile a module supporting it, instead
> of the whole kernel.

Actually my proposal is far simpler:
- the gcov-kernel module supports one GCC format (both gcov_info as well as .gcda)
- the module can be recompiled with different format support
- it will create correct .gcda files for all object files compiled with a
  compatible compiler
- for other object files, either the resulting .gcda files are unusable or no
  .gcda file would be registered at all (based on info->version differences),
  though that would raise the question on how to handle older GCC versions
  into which the new gcov format code was integrated

> Can you please give me an example why this is needed? As I wrote I'm not that
> familiar with gcov and I'm probably missing something, but I do not understand
> why this(handling several versions at runtime, not only the one used by gcc
> during compilation) is useful(note my comment above about the gcov used during
> development).

See note above from Christophe: kernel and module are compiled by different parties
at different times using different GCC versions, and apparently the production kernel
has gcov support enabled or they are providing a separate test kernel for that.



Regards,
  Peter

-- 
Peter Oberparleiter
Linux on System z Development - IBM Germany

      parent reply	other threads:[~2013-08-26 11:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-23  8:39 [RFC PATCH 0/4] add support for gcov format introduced in gcc 4.7 Frantisek Hrbata
2013-08-23  8:39 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] gcov: move gcov structs definitions to a gcc version specific file Frantisek Hrbata
2013-08-23  8:39   ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-08-23 15:09   ` Peter Oberparleiter
2013-08-23 15:09     ` Peter Oberparleiter
2013-08-23 16:50     ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-08-23 16:50       ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-08-26 12:17       ` Peter Oberparleiter
2013-08-23  8:39 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] gcov: add support for gcc 4.7 gcov format Frantisek Hrbata
2013-08-23  8:39   ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-08-23 15:12   ` Peter Oberparleiter
2013-08-23 21:00     ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-08-26 12:45       ` Peter Oberparleiter
2013-08-27 13:41         ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-08-27 13:41           ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-08-23  8:39 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] gcov: compile specific gcov implementation based on gcc version Frantisek Hrbata
2013-08-23  8:39   ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-08-23 15:15   ` Peter Oberparleiter
2013-08-23 15:21     ` Peter Oberparleiter
2013-08-24 19:44       ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-08-25 18:29         ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-08-26 14:14         ` Peter Oberparleiter
2013-08-27 13:34           ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-08-28 13:46             ` Peter Oberparleiter
2013-08-28 13:54               ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-08-28 13:54                 ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-08-24 19:12     ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-08-24 19:12       ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-08-26 12:56       ` Peter Oberparleiter
2013-08-26 12:56         ` Peter Oberparleiter
2013-08-27 13:23         ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-08-27 13:23           ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-08-23  8:39 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] kernel: add support for init_array constructors Frantisek Hrbata
2013-08-23  8:39   ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-08-23 15:13   ` Peter Oberparleiter
2013-08-23 16:55     ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-08-23 15:08 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] add support for gcov format introduced in gcc 4.7 Peter Oberparleiter
2013-08-23 16:15   ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-08-23 16:15     ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-08-26 11:39     ` LF.Tan
2013-08-26 11:39       ` LF.Tan
2013-08-26 14:19       ` Peter Oberparleiter
2013-08-27  2:38         ` LF.Tan
2013-08-26 11:57     ` Peter Oberparleiter [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=521B428F.6020801@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=oberpar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=agospoda@redhat.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=christophe.guillon@st.com \
    --cc=fhrbata@redhat.com \
    --cc=jstancek@redhat.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgahagan@redhat.com \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).