From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Metcalf Subject: Re: [PATCH] Kconfig cleanup (PARPORT_PC dependencies) Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 15:04:02 -0400 Message-ID: <52321022.6060907@tilera.com> References: <1379012038-31764-1-git-send-email-msalter@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from usmamail.tilera.com ([12.216.194.151]:20185 "EHLO USMAMAIL.TILERA.COM" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754963Ab3ILTEQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Sep 2013 15:04:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1379012038-31764-1-git-send-email-msalter@redhat.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Mark Salter Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rth@twiddle.net, vgupta@synopsys.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, tony.luck@intel.com, geert@linux-m68k.org, monstr@monstr.eu, ralf@linux-mips.org, jejb@parisc-linux.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org, lethal@linux-sh.org, davem@davemloft.net, gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com On 9/12/2013 2:53 PM, Mark Salter wrote: > Remove messy dependencies from PARPORT_PC by having it depend on one > Kconfig symbol (ARCH_MAY_HAVE_PC_PARPORT) and having architectures > which need it declare ARCH_MAY_HAVE_PC_PARPORT in arch/*/Kconfig. > New architectures are unlikely to need PARPORT_PC, so this avoids > having an ever growing list of architectures to exclude. Those > architectures which do declare ARCH_MAY_HAVE_PC_PARPORT in this > patch are the ones which have an asm/parport.h. > > Signed-off-by: Mark Salter You can actually omit the arch/tile change, since as far as I know there's no way for tile to have PARPORT_PC. -- Chris Metcalf, Tilera Corp. http://www.tilera.com