From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>
To: "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com>,
Noam Camus <noamc@ezchip.com>,
David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>,
James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>,
peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Richard Kuo <rkuo@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Preventing IPI sending races in arch code
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 16:22:18 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52932BE2.5010201@synopsys.com> (raw)
Hi,
I've been looking into cleaning up bitrot in ARC SMP support. Unlike some other
arches/platforms, we don't have per-msg-type IRQ, so the actual msg (say cross
function call) corresponding to IPI needs to be encoded in a per-cpu word (1 bit
per msg type) before kicking the IPI.
The current code (indicative below) is completely bonkers as it calls set_bit w/o
any protection whatsoever, clearly racy in case of multiple senders, where
receiver could end up NOT seeing one of the writes.
ipi_send_msg(cpu, msg-type)
{
struct ipi_data *ipi_data = &per_cpu(ipi_data, cpu);
local_irq_save();
set_bit(msg-type, &ipi_data->bits)
plat_smp_ops.ipi_send(cpumask)
local_irq_restore();
}
Adding a spinlock here would serialize the sending part, but I still see issue in
receiver. Upon receipt of First IPI, the msg holding word will be atomically
exchanged with 0, so 2nd IPI will not see any msg in the word. Augmenting with an
atomic counter would only help detect the issue - but I don't see how it will help
elide the issue.
Does that mean w/o proper hardware assist (i.e. IRQ providing the msg id
indication), the race, however small, remains ?
Comments much appreciated !
-Vineet
next reply other threads:[~2013-11-25 10:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-25 10:52 Vineet Gupta [this message]
2013-11-25 11:00 ` Preventing IPI sending races in arch code Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-25 11:30 ` Vineet Gupta
2013-11-25 12:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-25 13:35 ` Vineet Gupta
2013-11-25 13:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-25 13:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-25 19:51 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-11-26 4:47 ` Vineet Gupta
2013-11-26 5:11 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-11-26 6:35 ` Vineet Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52932BE2.5010201@synopsys.com \
--to=vineet.gupta1@synopsys.com \
--cc=david.daney@cavium.com \
--cc=gilad@benyossef.com \
--cc=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=noamc@ezchip.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rkuo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox