From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@hp.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
aswin@hp.com, Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/5] qrwlock: A queue read/write lock implementation
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 10:58:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52DE991F.1030900@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140120152129.GH31570@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On 01/20/2014 10:21 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:44:03PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:
>> +#ifndef arch_mutex_cpu_relax
>> +# define arch_mutex_cpu_relax() cpu_relax()
>> +#endif
> Include<linux/mutex.h>
>
Will do so.
>> +#ifndef smp_load_acquire
>> +# ifdef CONFIG_X86
>> +# define smp_load_acquire(p) \
>> + ({ \
>> + typeof(*p) ___p1 = ACCESS_ONCE(*p); \
>> + barrier(); \
>> + ___p1; \
>> + })
>> +# else
>> +# define smp_load_acquire(p) \
>> + ({ \
>> + typeof(*p) ___p1 = ACCESS_ONCE(*p); \
>> + smp_mb(); \
>> + ___p1; \
>> + })
>> +# endif
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +#ifndef smp_store_release
>> +# ifdef CONFIG_X86
>> +# define smp_store_release(p, v) \
>> + do { \
>> + barrier(); \
>> + ACCESS_ONCE(*p) = v; \
>> + } while (0)
>> +# else
>> +# define smp_store_release(p, v) \
>> + do { \
>> + smp_mb(); \
>> + ACCESS_ONCE(*p) = v; \
>> + } while (0)
>> +# endif
>> +#endif
> Remove these.
Will do that.
>> +/*
>> + * If an xadd (exchange-add) macro isn't available, simulate one with
>> + * the atomic_add_return() function.
>> + */
>> +#ifdef xadd
>> +# define qrw_xadd(rw, inc) xadd(&(rw).rwc, inc)
>> +#else
>> +# define qrw_xadd(rw, inc) (u32)(atomic_add_return(inc,&(rw).rwa) - inc)
>> +#endif
> Is GCC really so stupid that you cannot always use the
> atomic_add_return()? The x86 atomic_add_return is i + xadd(), so you'll
> end up with:
>
> i + xadd() - i
>
> Surely it can just remove the two i terms?
I guess gcc should do the right thing. I will remove the macro.
>> +/**
>> + * wait_in_queue - Add to queue and wait until it is at the head
>> + * @lock: Pointer to queue rwlock structure
>> + * @node: Node pointer to be added to the queue
>> + */
>> +static inline void wait_in_queue(struct qrwlock *lock, struct qrwnode *node)
>> +{
>> + struct qrwnode *prev;
>> +
>> + node->next = NULL;
>> + node->wait = true;
>> + prev = xchg(&lock->waitq, node);
>> + if (prev) {
>> + prev->next = node;
>> + /*
>> + * Wait until the waiting flag is off
>> + */
>> + while (smp_load_acquire(&node->wait))
>> + arch_mutex_cpu_relax();
>> + }
>> +}
> Please rebase on top of the MCS lock patches such that this is gone.
I would like to keep this as long as the MCS patches have not been
merged into tip. However, I will take that out if the MCS patches are in
when I need to revise the qrwlock patches.
-Longman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-21 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-15 4:44 [PATCH v9 0/5] qrwlock: Introducing a queue read/write lock implementation Waiman Long
2014-01-15 4:44 ` [PATCH v9 1/5] qrwlock: A " Waiman Long
2014-01-20 15:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-20 15:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-21 15:58 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2014-01-15 4:44 ` [PATCH v9 2/5] qrwlock x86: Enable x86 to use queue read/write lock Waiman Long
2014-01-15 4:44 ` Waiman Long
2014-01-20 16:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-20 16:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-20 16:16 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-01-21 16:00 ` Waiman Long
2014-01-15 4:44 ` [PATCH v9 3/5] qrwlock, x86 - Treat all data type not bigger than long as atomic in x86 Waiman Long
2014-01-15 4:44 ` Waiman Long
2014-01-20 15:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-20 15:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-21 15:36 ` Waiman Long
2014-01-21 15:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-21 16:09 ` Waiman Long
2014-01-22 0:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-01-22 4:42 ` Waiman Long
2014-01-22 4:42 ` Waiman Long
2014-01-22 8:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-22 12:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-01-22 12:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-22 13:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-01-27 17:09 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-15 4:44 ` [PATCH v9 4/5] qrwlock: Use smp_store_release() in write_unlock() Waiman Long
2014-01-15 4:44 ` Waiman Long
2014-01-20 3:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-20 15:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-20 15:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-21 15:45 ` Waiman Long
2014-01-21 15:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-21 15:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-15 4:44 ` [PATCH v9 5/5] qrwlock: Use the mcs_spinlock helper functions for MCS queuing Waiman Long
2014-01-15 4:44 ` Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52DE991F.1030900@hp.com \
--to=waiman.long@hp.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=aswin@hp.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@horizon.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=scott.norton@hp.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=walken@google.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).