From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chung-Lin Tang Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/28] nios2 Linux kernel port Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 01:59:42 +0800 Message-ID: <5357FF8E.9010809@codesourcery.com> References: <1397824031-4892-1-git-send-email-lftan@altera.com> <5354AD36.5090809@zytor.com> <16597012.pEkDc99HDN@wuerfel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Ley Foon Tan , Arnd Bergmann Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , Linux-Arch , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , Catalin.Marinas@arm.com, Andrew Pinski List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On 2014/4/22 07:20 PM, Ley Foon Tan wrote: > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> > On Tuesday 22 April 2014 18:37:11 Ley Foon Tan wrote: >>> >> Hi Arnd and Peter Anvin, >>> >> >>> >> Other than 64-bit time_t, clock_t and suseconds_t, can you confirm >>> >> that we don't need to have 64 bit off_t? See detail in link below. >>> >> I can submit the patches for 64-bit time changes >>> >> (include/asm-generic/posix_types.h and other archs) if everyone is >>> >> agreed on this. >> > >> > Yes. > Okay, will doing that. I believe that arm64 ILP32 will also be affected. What is the status of this configuration? Has the glibc/kernel ABI been finalized? Thanks, Chung-Lin From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay1.mentorg.com ([192.94.38.131]:60615 "EHLO relay1.mentorg.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754203AbaDWR7u (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Apr 2014 13:59:50 -0400 Message-ID: <5357FF8E.9010809@codesourcery.com> Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 01:59:42 +0800 From: Chung-Lin Tang MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/28] nios2 Linux kernel port References: <1397824031-4892-1-git-send-email-lftan@altera.com> <5354AD36.5090809@zytor.com> <16597012.pEkDc99HDN@wuerfel> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Ley Foon Tan , Arnd Bergmann Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , Linux-Arch , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , Catalin.Marinas@arm.com, Andrew Pinski Message-ID: <20140423175942.RP4ZrCfbVrORxpLOpMA-JLPxvLFrDmDim-FmVr5BORU@z> On 2014/4/22 07:20 PM, Ley Foon Tan wrote: > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> > On Tuesday 22 April 2014 18:37:11 Ley Foon Tan wrote: >>> >> Hi Arnd and Peter Anvin, >>> >> >>> >> Other than 64-bit time_t, clock_t and suseconds_t, can you confirm >>> >> that we don't need to have 64 bit off_t? See detail in link below. >>> >> I can submit the patches for 64-bit time changes >>> >> (include/asm-generic/posix_types.h and other archs) if everyone is >>> >> agreed on this. >> > >> > Yes. > Okay, will doing that. I believe that arm64 ILP32 will also be affected. What is the status of this configuration? Has the glibc/kernel ABI been finalized? Thanks, Chung-Lin