From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pedro Alves Subject: Re: [PATCH 25/28] nios2: ptrace support Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2014 00:52:07 +0100 Message-ID: <535AF527.80601@redhat.com> References: <1397824031-4892-1-git-send-email-lftan@altera.com> <1397824031-4892-22-git-send-email-lftan@altera.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:19394 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751334AbaDYXwO (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Apr 2014 19:52:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1397824031-4892-22-git-send-email-lftan@altera.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Ley Foon Tan Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, lftan.linux@gmail.com, cltang@codesourcery.com Does this support PTRACE_GETREGSET / PTRACE_SETREGSET ? IMO, the kernel shouldn't accept ports without those anymore. And IMHO, we shouldn't even allow new ports having PTRACE_GETREGS. http://sourceware.org/ml/archer/2010-q3/msg00193.html -- Pedro Alves