From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [RFC 11/32] xfs: convert to struct inode_time Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 15:32:35 -0700 Message-ID: <538CFB83.20703@zytor.com> References: <1401480116-1973111-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <8618458.1EVJCoVbkH@wuerfel> <4178301.j9kWdGCRLC@wuerfel> <6868F108-F0B2-423F-AE31-90DF86A5B7DD@oracle.com> <20140602153124.GH30598@thunk.org> <538CB085.5000502@zytor.com> <20140602222954.GA29690@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:57423 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751128AbaFBWft (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jun 2014 18:35:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20140602222954.GA29690@thunk.org> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Theodore Ts'o , Chuck Lever , Arnd Bergmann , Nicolas Pitre , Dave Chinner , LKML Kernel , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, joseph@codesourcery.com, john.stultz@linaro.org, Christoph Hellwig , tglx@linutronix.de, geert@linux-m68k.org, lftan@altera.com, linux-fsdevel , xfs@oss.sgi.com, Linux NFS Mailing List On 06/02/2014 03:29 PM, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > And since we are already returning (time_t) -1 in some cases, we might > as well try to make things a bit more formal. > Are we? I am not aware of *Linux* actually using that. -hpa