From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 03/10] tools: Add le_direct/be_direct methods for unaligned access Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 16:41:10 -0700 Message-ID: <53979796.40205@zytor.com> References: <1402441994-16780-1-git-send-email-hpa@zytor.com> <1402441994-16780-4-git-send-email-hpa@zytor.com> <5397952E.9040008@zytor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:38971 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752290AbaFJXlf (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jun 2014 19:41:35 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Sam Ravnborg , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org" , linux-arch , Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner On 06/10/2014 04:33 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > Ah, sneaky. > > Would it make sense to put a comment in this file (and similar files) > indicating that they must only be included on architectures of the > appropriate endianness? > That might make sense, yes, although I don't think we do that for the kernel variants. -hpa