From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@hp.com> To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, riel@redhat.com, gleb@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, konrad.wilk@oracle.com, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, scott.norton@hp.com, raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com, paolo.bonzini@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, chegu_vinod@hp.com, david.vrabel@citrix.com, oleg@redhat.com, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, tglx@linutronix.de, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, mingo@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/11] qspinlock: Paravirt support Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 20:53:22 -0400 [thread overview] Message-ID: <539F9182.3070804@hp.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20140615130154.213923590@chello.nl> I am resending it as my original reply has some HTML code & hence rejected by the mailing lists. On 06/15/2014 08:47 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS > + > +/* > + * Write a comment about how all this works... > + */ > + > +#define _Q_LOCKED_SLOW (2U<< _Q_LOCKED_OFFSET) > + > +struct pv_node { > + struct mcs_spinlock mcs; > + struct mcs_spinlock __offset[3]; > + int cpu, head; > +}; I am wondering why you need the separate cpu and head variables. I thought one will be enough here. The wait code put the cpu number in head, the the kick_cpu code kick the one in cpu which is just the cpu # of the tail. > + > +#define INVALID_HEAD -1 > +#define NO_HEAD nr_cpu_ids > + I think it is better to use a constant like -2 for NO_HEAD instead of an external variable. > +void __pv_init_node(struct mcs_spinlock *node) > +{ > + struct pv_node *pn = (struct pv_node *)node; > + > + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct pv_node)> 5*sizeof(struct mcs_spinlock)); > + > + pn->cpu = smp_processor_id(); > + pn->head = INVALID_HEAD; > +} > + > +static inline struct pv_node *pv_decode_tail(u32 tail) > +{ > + return (struct pv_node *)decode_tail(tail); > +} > + > +void __pv_link_and_wait_node(u32 old, struct mcs_spinlock *node) > +{ > + struct pv_node *ppn, *pn = (struct pv_node *)node; > + unsigned int count; > + > + if (!(old& _Q_TAIL_MASK)) { > + pn->head = NO_HEAD; > + return; > + } > + > + ppn = pv_decode_tail(old); > + ACCESS_ONCE(ppn->mcs.next) = node; > + > + while (ppn->head == INVALID_HEAD) > + cpu_relax(); > + > + pn->head = ppn->head; A race can happen here as pn->head can be changed to the head cpu by the head waiter while being changed by this function at the same time. It is safer to use cmpxchg to make sure that there is no accidental overwriting of the head CPU number. > + > + for (;;) { > + count = SPIN_THRESHOLD; > + > + do { > + if (smp_load_acquire(&node->locked)) > + return; > + > + cpu_relax(); > + } while (--count); > + > + pv_wait(&node->locked, 1); > + } > +} > + > +void __pv_kick_node(struct mcs_spinlock *node) > +{ > + struct pv_node *pn = (struct pv_node *)node; > + > + pv_kick(pn->cpu); > +} > + > +void __pv_wait_head(struct qspinlock *lock) > +{ > + unsigned int count; > + struct pv_node *pn; > + int val, old, new; > + > + for (;;) { > + count = SPIN_THRESHOLD; > + > + do { > + val = smp_load_acquire(&lock->val.counter); > + if (!(val& _Q_LOCKED_PENDING_MASK)) > + return; > + } while (--count); > + > + do { > + pn = pv_decode_tail(atomic_read(&lock->val)); > + > + while (pn->head == INVALID_HEAD) > + cpu_relax(); > + > + pn->head = smp_processor_id(); > + > + } while (pn != pv_decode_tail(atomic_read(&lock->val))); > + > + /* > + * Set _Q_LOCKED_SLOW; bail when the lock is free. > + */ > + val = atomic_read(&lock->val); > + for (;;) { > + if (!(val& _Q_LOCKED_PENDING_MASK)) > + return; > + new = val | _Q_LOCKED_SLOW; > + old = atomic_cmpxchg(&lock->val, val, new); > + if (old == val) > + break; > + val = old; > + } > + > + /* XXX 16bit would be better */ > + pv_wait(&lock->val.counter, new); > + } > +} > + > +static void ___pv_kick_head(struct qspinlock *lock) > +{ > + struct pv_node *pn; > + > + pn = pv_decode_tail(atomic_read(&lock->val)); > + > + while (pn->head == INVALID_HEAD) > + cpu_relax(); > + > + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(pn->head == NO_HEAD)) > + return; > + > + pv_kick(pn->head); > +} > + > +void __pv_queue_unlock(struct qspinlock *lock) > +{ > + int val = atomic_read(&lock->val); > + > + native_queue_unlock(lock); > + > + if (val& _Q_LOCKED_SLOW) > + ___pv_kick_head(lock); > +} > + Again a race can happen here between the reading and writing of the lock value. I can't think of a good way to do that without using cmpxchg. > +#else > + > +static inline void pv_init_node(struct mcs_spinlock *node) { } > +static inline void pv_link_and_wait_node(u32 old, struct mcs_spinlock *node) { } > +static inline void pv_kick_node(struct mcs_spinlock *node) { } > + > +static inline void pv_wait_head(struct qspinlock *lock) { } > + > +#endif > + > /** > * queue_spin_lock_slowpath - acquire the queue spinlock > * @lock: Pointer to queue spinlock structure > @@ -247,6 +417,9 @@ void queue_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qsp > > BUILD_BUG_ON(CONFIG_NR_CPUS>= (1U<< _Q_TAIL_CPU_BITS)); > > + if (pv_enabled()) > + goto queue; > + > if (virt_queue_spin_lock(lock)) > return; > > @@ -323,6 +496,7 @@ void queue_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qsp > node += idx; > node->locked = 0; > node->next = NULL; > + pv_init_node(node); > > /* > * We touched a (possibly) cold cacheline in the per-cpu queue node; > @@ -343,6 +517,7 @@ void queue_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qsp > /* > * if there was a previous node; link it and wait. > */ > + pv_link_and_wait_node(old, node); > if (old& _Q_TAIL_MASK) { > prev = decode_tail(old); > ACCESS_ONCE(prev->next) = node; > @@ -358,6 +533,7 @@ void queue_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qsp > * > * *,x,y -> *,0,0 > */ > + pv_wait_head(lock); > while ((val = smp_load_acquire(&lock->val.counter))& > _Q_LOCKED_PENDING_MASK) > cpu_relax(); > @@ -391,6 +567,7 @@ void queue_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qsp > cpu_relax(); > > arch_mcs_spin_unlock_contended(&next->locked); > + pv_kick_node(next); > pv_kick_node is an expensive operation and it can significantly slow down the locking operation if we have to do it for every subsequent task in the queue. -Longman
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@hp.com> To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, paolo.bonzini@gmail.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, riel@redhat.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com, david.vrabel@citrix.com, oleg@redhat.com, gleb@redhat.com, scott.norton@hp.com, chegu_vinod@hp.com, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/11] qspinlock: Paravirt support Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 20:53:22 -0400 [thread overview] Message-ID: <539F9182.3070804@hp.com> (raw) Message-ID: <20140617005322.55gRANNDRWfhBUAxphQ_iWIQorYDnjuxpMvaoLrOTuU@z> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20140615130154.213923590@chello.nl> I am resending it as my original reply has some HTML code & hence rejected by the mailing lists. On 06/15/2014 08:47 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS > + > +/* > + * Write a comment about how all this works... > + */ > + > +#define _Q_LOCKED_SLOW (2U<< _Q_LOCKED_OFFSET) > + > +struct pv_node { > + struct mcs_spinlock mcs; > + struct mcs_spinlock __offset[3]; > + int cpu, head; > +}; I am wondering why you need the separate cpu and head variables. I thought one will be enough here. The wait code put the cpu number in head, the the kick_cpu code kick the one in cpu which is just the cpu # of the tail. > + > +#define INVALID_HEAD -1 > +#define NO_HEAD nr_cpu_ids > + I think it is better to use a constant like -2 for NO_HEAD instead of an external variable. > +void __pv_init_node(struct mcs_spinlock *node) > +{ > + struct pv_node *pn = (struct pv_node *)node; > + > + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct pv_node)> 5*sizeof(struct mcs_spinlock)); > + > + pn->cpu = smp_processor_id(); > + pn->head = INVALID_HEAD; > +} > + > +static inline struct pv_node *pv_decode_tail(u32 tail) > +{ > + return (struct pv_node *)decode_tail(tail); > +} > + > +void __pv_link_and_wait_node(u32 old, struct mcs_spinlock *node) > +{ > + struct pv_node *ppn, *pn = (struct pv_node *)node; > + unsigned int count; > + > + if (!(old& _Q_TAIL_MASK)) { > + pn->head = NO_HEAD; > + return; > + } > + > + ppn = pv_decode_tail(old); > + ACCESS_ONCE(ppn->mcs.next) = node; > + > + while (ppn->head == INVALID_HEAD) > + cpu_relax(); > + > + pn->head = ppn->head; A race can happen here as pn->head can be changed to the head cpu by the head waiter while being changed by this function at the same time. It is safer to use cmpxchg to make sure that there is no accidental overwriting of the head CPU number. > + > + for (;;) { > + count = SPIN_THRESHOLD; > + > + do { > + if (smp_load_acquire(&node->locked)) > + return; > + > + cpu_relax(); > + } while (--count); > + > + pv_wait(&node->locked, 1); > + } > +} > + > +void __pv_kick_node(struct mcs_spinlock *node) > +{ > + struct pv_node *pn = (struct pv_node *)node; > + > + pv_kick(pn->cpu); > +} > + > +void __pv_wait_head(struct qspinlock *lock) > +{ > + unsigned int count; > + struct pv_node *pn; > + int val, old, new; > + > + for (;;) { > + count = SPIN_THRESHOLD; > + > + do { > + val = smp_load_acquire(&lock->val.counter); > + if (!(val& _Q_LOCKED_PENDING_MASK)) > + return; > + } while (--count); > + > + do { > + pn = pv_decode_tail(atomic_read(&lock->val)); > + > + while (pn->head == INVALID_HEAD) > + cpu_relax(); > + > + pn->head = smp_processor_id(); > + > + } while (pn != pv_decode_tail(atomic_read(&lock->val))); > + > + /* > + * Set _Q_LOCKED_SLOW; bail when the lock is free. > + */ > + val = atomic_read(&lock->val); > + for (;;) { > + if (!(val& _Q_LOCKED_PENDING_MASK)) > + return; > + new = val | _Q_LOCKED_SLOW; > + old = atomic_cmpxchg(&lock->val, val, new); > + if (old == val) > + break; > + val = old; > + } > + > + /* XXX 16bit would be better */ > + pv_wait(&lock->val.counter, new); > + } > +} > + > +static void ___pv_kick_head(struct qspinlock *lock) > +{ > + struct pv_node *pn; > + > + pn = pv_decode_tail(atomic_read(&lock->val)); > + > + while (pn->head == INVALID_HEAD) > + cpu_relax(); > + > + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(pn->head == NO_HEAD)) > + return; > + > + pv_kick(pn->head); > +} > + > +void __pv_queue_unlock(struct qspinlock *lock) > +{ > + int val = atomic_read(&lock->val); > + > + native_queue_unlock(lock); > + > + if (val& _Q_LOCKED_SLOW) > + ___pv_kick_head(lock); > +} > + Again a race can happen here between the reading and writing of the lock value. I can't think of a good way to do that without using cmpxchg. > +#else > + > +static inline void pv_init_node(struct mcs_spinlock *node) { } > +static inline void pv_link_and_wait_node(u32 old, struct mcs_spinlock *node) { } > +static inline void pv_kick_node(struct mcs_spinlock *node) { } > + > +static inline void pv_wait_head(struct qspinlock *lock) { } > + > +#endif > + > /** > * queue_spin_lock_slowpath - acquire the queue spinlock > * @lock: Pointer to queue spinlock structure > @@ -247,6 +417,9 @@ void queue_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qsp > > BUILD_BUG_ON(CONFIG_NR_CPUS>= (1U<< _Q_TAIL_CPU_BITS)); > > + if (pv_enabled()) > + goto queue; > + > if (virt_queue_spin_lock(lock)) > return; > > @@ -323,6 +496,7 @@ void queue_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qsp > node += idx; > node->locked = 0; > node->next = NULL; > + pv_init_node(node); > > /* > * We touched a (possibly) cold cacheline in the per-cpu queue node; > @@ -343,6 +517,7 @@ void queue_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qsp > /* > * if there was a previous node; link it and wait. > */ > + pv_link_and_wait_node(old, node); > if (old& _Q_TAIL_MASK) { > prev = decode_tail(old); > ACCESS_ONCE(prev->next) = node; > @@ -358,6 +533,7 @@ void queue_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qsp > * > * *,x,y -> *,0,0 > */ > + pv_wait_head(lock); > while ((val = smp_load_acquire(&lock->val.counter))& > _Q_LOCKED_PENDING_MASK) > cpu_relax(); > @@ -391,6 +567,7 @@ void queue_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qsp > cpu_relax(); > > arch_mcs_spin_unlock_contended(&next->locked); > + pv_kick_node(next); > pv_kick_node is an expensive operation and it can significantly slow down the locking operation if we have to do it for every subsequent task in the queue. -Longman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-17 0:53 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 120+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2014-06-15 12:46 [PATCH 00/11] qspinlock with paravirt support Peter Zijlstra 2014-06-15 12:46 ` Peter Zijlstra 2014-06-15 12:46 ` [PATCH 01/11] qspinlock: A simple generic 4-byte queue spinlock Peter Zijlstra 2014-06-15 12:46 ` Peter Zijlstra 2014-06-16 20:49 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2014-06-16 20:49 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2014-06-17 20:03 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2014-06-17 20:03 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2014-06-23 16:12 ` Peter Zijlstra 2014-06-23 16:12 ` Peter Zijlstra 2014-06-23 16:20 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2014-06-23 16:20 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2014-06-23 15:56 ` Peter Zijlstra 2014-06-23 16:16 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2014-06-23 16:16 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2014-06-17 20:05 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2014-06-17 20:05 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2014-06-23 16:26 ` Peter Zijlstra 2014-06-23 16:26 ` Peter Zijlstra 2014-06-23 16:45 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2014-06-23 16:45 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2014-06-15 12:46 ` [PATCH 02/11] qspinlock, x86: Enable x86-64 to use " Peter Zijlstra 2014-06-15 12:46 ` Peter Zijlstra 2014-06-15 12:47 ` [PATCH 03/11] qspinlock: Add pending bit Peter Zijlstra 2014-06-15 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra 2014-06-17 20:36 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2014-06-17 20:36 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2014-06-17 20:51 ` Waiman Long 2014-06-17 20:51 ` Waiman Long 2014-06-17 21:07 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2014-06-17 21:07 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2014-06-17 21:10 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2014-06-17 21:10 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2014-06-17 22:25 ` Waiman Long 2014-06-17 22:25 ` Waiman Long 2014-06-24 8:24 ` Peter Zijlstra 2014-06-24 8:24 ` Peter Zijlstra 2014-06-18 11:29 ` Paolo Bonzini 2014-06-18 11:29 ` Paolo Bonzini 2014-06-18 13:36 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2014-06-18 13:36 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2014-06-23 16:35 ` Peter Zijlstra 2014-06-23 16:35 ` Peter Zijlstra 2014-06-15 12:47 ` [PATCH 04/11] qspinlock: Extract out the exchange of tail code word Peter Zijlstra 2014-06-17 20:55 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2014-06-17 20:55 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2014-06-18 11:37 ` Paolo Bonzini 2014-06-18 11:37 ` Paolo Bonzini 2014-06-18 13:50 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2014-06-18 13:50 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2014-06-18 15:46 ` Waiman Long 2014-06-18 15:46 ` Waiman Long 2014-06-18 15:49 ` Paolo Bonzini 2014-06-18 15:49 ` Paolo Bonzini 2014-06-18 16:02 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2014-06-18 16:02 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2014-06-24 10:47 ` Peter Zijlstra 2014-06-24 10:47 ` Peter Zijlstra 2014-06-15 12:47 ` [PATCH 05/11] qspinlock: Optimize for smaller NR_CPUS Peter Zijlstra 2014-06-15 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra 2014-06-18 11:39 ` Paolo Bonzini 2014-06-18 11:39 ` Paolo Bonzini 2014-07-07 14:35 ` Peter Zijlstra 2014-07-07 14:35 ` Peter Zijlstra 2014-07-07 15:08 ` Paolo Bonzini 2014-07-07 15:08 ` Paolo Bonzini 2014-07-07 15:35 ` Peter Zijlstra 2014-07-07 15:35 ` Peter Zijlstra 2014-07-07 16:10 ` Paolo Bonzini 2014-07-07 16:10 ` Paolo Bonzini 2014-06-18 15:57 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2014-06-18 15:57 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2014-07-07 14:33 ` Peter Zijlstra 2014-07-07 14:33 ` Peter Zijlstra 2014-06-15 12:47 ` [PATCH 06/11] qspinlock: Optimize pending bit Peter Zijlstra 2014-06-15 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra 2014-06-18 11:42 ` Paolo Bonzini 2014-06-18 11:42 ` Paolo Bonzini 2014-06-15 12:47 ` [PATCH 07/11] qspinlock: Use a simple write to grab the lock, if applicable Peter Zijlstra 2014-06-15 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra 2014-06-18 16:36 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2014-06-18 16:36 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2014-07-07 14:51 ` Peter Zijlstra 2014-07-07 14:51 ` Peter Zijlstra 2014-06-15 12:47 ` [PATCH 08/11] qspinlock: Revert to test-and-set on hypervisors Peter Zijlstra 2014-06-15 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra 2014-06-16 21:57 ` Waiman Long 2014-06-18 16:40 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2014-06-18 16:40 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2014-06-15 12:47 ` [PATCH 09/11] pvqspinlock, x86: Rename paravirt_ticketlocks_enabled Peter Zijlstra 2014-06-15 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra 2014-06-18 16:43 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2014-06-18 16:43 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2014-06-15 12:47 ` [PATCH 10/11] qspinlock: Paravirt support Peter Zijlstra 2014-06-15 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra 2014-06-16 22:08 ` Waiman Long 2014-06-18 12:03 ` Paolo Bonzini 2014-06-18 12:03 ` Paolo Bonzini 2014-06-18 15:26 ` Waiman Long 2014-06-18 15:26 ` Waiman Long 2014-07-07 15:20 ` Peter Zijlstra 2014-07-07 15:20 ` Peter Zijlstra 2014-07-07 15:20 ` Peter Zijlstra 2014-07-07 15:20 ` Peter Zijlstra 2014-06-17 0:53 ` Waiman Long [this message] 2014-06-17 0:53 ` Waiman Long 2014-06-18 12:04 ` Paolo Bonzini 2014-06-18 12:04 ` Paolo Bonzini 2014-06-20 13:46 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2014-06-20 13:46 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2014-07-07 15:27 ` Peter Zijlstra 2014-07-15 14:23 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2014-07-15 14:23 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2014-06-15 12:47 ` [PATCH 11/11] qspinlock, kvm: Add paravirt support Peter Zijlstra 2014-06-22 16:36 ` Raghavendra K T 2014-06-22 16:36 ` Raghavendra K T 2014-07-07 15:23 ` Peter Zijlstra 2014-07-07 15:23 ` Peter Zijlstra 2014-06-16 20:52 ` [PATCH 00/11] qspinlock with " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2014-06-16 20:52 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=539F9182.3070804@hp.com \ --to=waiman.long@hp.com \ --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \ --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \ --cc=chegu_vinod@hp.com \ --cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \ --cc=gleb@redhat.com \ --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \ --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mingo@kernel.org \ --cc=oleg@redhat.com \ --cc=paolo.bonzini@gmail.com \ --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \ --cc=peterz@infradead.org \ --cc=raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \ --cc=riel@redhat.com \ --cc=scott.norton@hp.com \ --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \ --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \ --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).