From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, thellstrom@vmware.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, ccross@google.com,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] Updated fence patch series
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 11:12:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53B3CD00.5030003@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140702053758.GA7578@kroah.com>
op 02-07-14 07:37, Greg KH schreef:
> On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 12:57:02PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> So after some more hacking I've moved dma-buf to its own subdirectory,
>> drivers/dma-buf and applied the fence patches to its new place. I believe that the
>> first patch should be applied regardless, and the rest should be ready now.
>> :-)
>>
>> Changes to the fence api:
>> - release_fence -> fence_release etc.
>> - __fence_init -> fence_init
>> - __fence_signal -> fence_signal_locked
>> - __fence_is_signaled -> fence_is_signaled_locked
>> - Changing BUG_ON to WARN_ON in fence_later, and return NULL if it triggers.
>>
>> Android can expose fences to userspace. It's possible to make the new fence
>> mechanism expose the same fences to userspace by changing sync_fence_create
>> to take a struct fence instead of a struct sync_pt. No other change is needed,
>> because only the fence parts of struct sync_pt are used. But because the
>> userspace fences are a separate problem and I haven't really looked at it yet
>> I feel it should stay in staging, for now.
> Ok, that's reasonable.
>
> At first glance, this all looks "sane" to me, any objection from anyone
> if I merge this through my driver-core tree for 3.17?
>
Sounds good to me, let me know when you pull it in, so I can rebase my drm conversion on top of it. :-)
~Maarten
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, thellstrom@vmware.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, robdclark@gmail.com,
thierry.reding@gmail.com, ccross@google.com, daniel@ffwll.ch,
sumit.semwal@linaro.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] Updated fence patch series
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 11:12:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53B3CD00.5030003@canonical.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20140702091232.8yHN2ZV3CdyCCPfsLkDpQg5e0MqFe_E8O-pRhITVhpY@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140702053758.GA7578@kroah.com>
op 02-07-14 07:37, Greg KH schreef:
> On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 12:57:02PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> So after some more hacking I've moved dma-buf to its own subdirectory,
>> drivers/dma-buf and applied the fence patches to its new place. I believe that the
>> first patch should be applied regardless, and the rest should be ready now.
>> :-)
>>
>> Changes to the fence api:
>> - release_fence -> fence_release etc.
>> - __fence_init -> fence_init
>> - __fence_signal -> fence_signal_locked
>> - __fence_is_signaled -> fence_is_signaled_locked
>> - Changing BUG_ON to WARN_ON in fence_later, and return NULL if it triggers.
>>
>> Android can expose fences to userspace. It's possible to make the new fence
>> mechanism expose the same fences to userspace by changing sync_fence_create
>> to take a struct fence instead of a struct sync_pt. No other change is needed,
>> because only the fence parts of struct sync_pt are used. But because the
>> userspace fences are a separate problem and I haven't really looked at it yet
>> I feel it should stay in staging, for now.
> Ok, that's reasonable.
>
> At first glance, this all looks "sane" to me, any objection from anyone
> if I merge this through my driver-core tree for 3.17?
>
Sounds good to me, let me know when you pull it in, so I can rebase my drm conversion on top of it. :-)
~Maarten
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-02 9:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-01 10:57 [PATCH v2 0/9] Updated fence patch series Maarten Lankhorst
2014-07-01 10:57 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2014-07-01 10:57 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] dma-buf: move to drivers/dma-buf Maarten Lankhorst
2014-07-01 10:57 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2014-07-01 11:06 ` Arend van Spriel
2014-07-01 11:09 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2014-07-01 11:09 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2014-07-01 10:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] fence: dma-buf cross-device synchronization (v18) Maarten Lankhorst
2014-07-01 10:57 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2014-07-01 10:57 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] seqno-fence: Hardware dma-buf implementation of fencing (v6) Maarten Lankhorst
2014-07-01 10:57 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2014-07-01 10:57 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] dma-buf: use reservation objects Maarten Lankhorst
2014-07-01 10:57 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2014-07-01 10:57 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] android: convert sync to fence api, v6 Maarten Lankhorst
2014-07-01 10:57 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2014-07-01 10:57 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] reservation: add support for fences to enable cross-device synchronisation Maarten Lankhorst
2014-07-01 10:57 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2014-07-01 10:57 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] dma-buf: add poll support, v3 Maarten Lankhorst
2014-07-01 10:57 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2014-07-01 10:57 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] reservation: update api and add some helpers Maarten Lankhorst
2014-07-01 10:57 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2014-07-01 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] reservation: add suppport for read-only access using rcu Maarten Lankhorst
2014-07-01 10:58 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2014-07-02 5:37 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] Updated fence patch series Greg KH
2014-07-02 5:37 ` Greg KH
2014-07-02 9:12 ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2014-07-02 9:12 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2014-07-08 20:46 ` Greg KH
2014-07-08 20:46 ` Greg KH
2014-07-07 13:23 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-07 13:23 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-07 17:30 ` Greg KH
2014-07-07 17:30 ` Greg KH
2014-07-08 13:44 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-08 13:44 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-08 14:39 ` Greg KH
2014-07-08 14:39 ` Greg KH
2014-07-08 14:52 ` Sumit Semwal
2014-07-08 17:52 ` Greg KH
2014-07-08 17:52 ` Greg KH
2014-07-07 17:27 ` Sumit Semwal
2014-07-07 17:27 ` Sumit Semwal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53B3CD00.5030003@canonical.com \
--to=maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com \
--cc=ccross@google.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thellstrom@vmware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox