From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] Two-phase seccomp and x86 tracing changes Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 10:59:45 -0700 Message-ID: <53D68F91.4000106@zytor.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-security-module-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andy Lutomirski , Kees Cook Cc: LKML , Will Drewry , Oleg Nesterov , "x86@kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Linux MIPS Mailing List , linux-arch , linux-security-module , Alexei Starovoitov List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On 07/23/2014 12:20 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > It looks like patches 1-4 have landed here: > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/kees/linux.git/log/?h=seccomp/fastpath > > hpa, what's the route forward for the x86 part? > I guess I should discuss this with Kees to figure out what makes most sense. In the meantime, could you address Oleg's question? -hpa From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:47703 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750985AbaG1SAc (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2014 14:00:32 -0400 Message-ID: <53D68F91.4000106@zytor.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 10:59:45 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] Two-phase seccomp and x86 tracing changes References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Andy Lutomirski , Kees Cook Cc: LKML , Will Drewry , Oleg Nesterov , "x86@kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Linux MIPS Mailing List , linux-arch , linux-security-module , Alexei Starovoitov Message-ID: <20140728175945.u4DDXjUzNioEf_tJslDH4Cb2wOWZaPhyJRuazTeySVU@z> On 07/23/2014 12:20 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > It looks like patches 1-4 have landed here: > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/kees/linux.git/log/?h=seccomp/fastpath > > hpa, what's the route forward for the x86 part? > I guess I should discuss this with Kees to figure out what makes most sense. In the meantime, could you address Oleg's question? -hpa