From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Weinberger Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Global signal cleanup Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2014 09:35:56 +0200 Message-ID: <53E32C5C.5010103@nod.at> References: <53E20F1E.2080606@nod.at> <20140806212720.66dbd58b@canb.auug.org.au> <53E21186.3000702@nod.at> <20140807102823.7a743bdf@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pjSBldROt1suUeH1jhKBiWnxfO8hGaAaB" Return-path: Received: from a.ns.miles-group.at ([95.130.255.143]:65276 "EHLO radon.swed.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754037AbaHGHgB (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Aug 2014 03:36:01 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20140807102823.7a743bdf@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Linus Torvalds , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Linux-Arch This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --pjSBldROt1suUeH1jhKBiWnxfO8hGaAaB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am 07.08.2014 02:28, schrieb Stephen Rothwell: > Hi Richard, >=20 > On Wed, 06 Aug 2014 13:29:10 +0200 Richard Weinberger = wrote: >> >> Am 06.08.2014 13:27, schrieb Stephen Rothwell: >>> >>> On Wed, 06 Aug 2014 13:18:54 +0200 Richard Weinberger wrote: >>>> >>>> the following changes since commit 19583ca584d6f574384e17fe7613dfaea= dcdc4a6: >>>> >>>> Linux 3.16 (2014-08-03 15:25:02 -0700) >>>> >>>> are available in the git repository at: >>>> >>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rw/misc.git signal-c= leanup >>> >>> This has all been rebased onto v3.16 but none of the patches changed.= >> >> This was my indention. Also I've added some acks. >> Did I screw something up? >=20 > We discourage people from rebasing their trees just before asking Linus= > to pull them unless they have a good reason. Adding Acks is not > necessarily a good reason. It may be a different thing if you rewrite > your tree (without changing it base) and, given that none of your > actual patches changed, that would have worked for you. >=20 > In your case, since you haven't updated the branch (signal_v4) that I > fetch for linux-next, its doubly bad as, after Linus' pulls your tree, > I will have two copies of all those patches in my tree - which could > easily lead to conflicts that I really don't need to have. >=20 > Also, note that the fact that the actual patches did not change at all > means that either you missed some change that coudl have justified the > rebase, or the rebase was unnecessary (since the things you are > patching did not change). >=20 Thanks for the kind explanation. It would be nice to see these rules written down somewhere. Thanks, //richard --pjSBldROt1suUeH1jhKBiWnxfO8hGaAaB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJT4yxcAAoJEPmeIjfg4Uaae3UQAJEeWfauWDyHSEUmC1tPfbQY SoWsSwOBytySwVnvdJgOad7lkqQPOBCpMC1Qkx7wUpZ2kM0iIe/TsO652hPRfalt mm0meQSFzs8rqW/vQvRD0bWf4GmEa4VwO4k6xr3fHqvuOUHCCHzuhnUoO3TFieJU 7bTibYl+rGzCPOv+6fT3SZYwMP5/Ai8Xq2ydv83gw1JHjCaVzwT0/s4aCzQCG6sO /mxPWc6gQu54ChyP74bSlvpGvlzwXe9MG1kXoXpzsUIe2f9tl621rddFgfIC5PTI +z7Ru/hBcoH6iiVSskULUdhaYww+OHmLSwZ2fX5srAFIKfaeKBJdND5SY3enT7+L e4VTyAj3cD2WRn8erpGr7pymA9LqlGJttUKu4eFzSABpeIZM30AMg+BHEUj6puKk p2Jk1ciS+IZ58TxmI6u4TvrDR9f7Qy4aIA45kq6RUvATqTRF5W6DEkv5jaMzwl/4 2KC6L+bvmCd3GSdMCGlsJzM8hlzMGbDWLDEw3/0lZLTl6+fNtiXPK4onhXFXv8VH koGwKDOwOy48aHGig2+BPZxWwbA3kYqzju66eEWR56nqT8is83Z6ru2YEEEttyft 2KAcxZKiwLoWn52ns/yZxNkh7bhs9wCI0nlTQX2QZsCxgR9/GIv9ZzkGiz2B938q nGeWuduJJDuoRI5JyBSI =yAvt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pjSBldROt1suUeH1jhKBiWnxfO8hGaAaB--