From: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
To: "Bharat.Bhushan@freescale.com" <Bharat.Bhushan@freescale.com>,
"arnab.basu@freescale.com" <arnab.basu@freescale.com>
Cc: Xinwei Hu <huxinwei@huawei.com>, Wuyun <wuyun.wu@huawei.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"Paul.Mundt@huawei.com" <Paul.Mundt@huawei.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
"virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/11] Refactor MSI to support Non-PCI device
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 14:28:50 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53F44022.6030706@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8a2b4e237f2d4c7e95ef72867658b53a@BLUPR03MB566.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
>> The key difference between PCI device and Non-PCI MSI is the interfaces to
>> access hardware MSI registers.
>> for instance, currently, msi_chip->setup_irq() to setup MSI irq and configure
>> the MSI address/data registers, so we need to provide device specific
>> write_msi_msg() interface, then when we call msi_chip->setup_irq(), the device
>> MSI registers can be configured appropriately.
>
> What if we can register/override the setup_irq() from bus-driver (not sure, but may be device-driver itself). Example PCI bus-driver will provide setup_irq() (or the part of setup_irq which set address and data in h/w) by PCI bus, which configure address/data in h/w as per PCI standard.
>
> We in Freescale will be using MSI for the devices behind a new-bus (which is not PCI based), We have a separate bus driver for same. And this new bus driver register/provide its own address/data write function which is based on that specific bus protocol.
Hi Bharat, I'm glad to know your MSI device working mode.
Provide the private MSI setup functions in bus-driver layer can't apply to all Non-PCI MSI devices,
because we can not guarantee Non-PCI MSI devices are always on a bus. The existing HPET, DMAR device both
have no bus bind. I'm working on a new MSI setup framework, as you mentioned before, in device-driver model.
I abstracted a new virtual device (called struct msi_dev), this msi_dev will manage all MSI info, and a new bus
named msi_bus, also introduced a new driver msi_driver, msi_bus is responsible for binding msi_dev and msi_driver.
All MSI devices will be classified into different MSI device types, like MSI_TYPE_PCI, MSI_TYPE_HPET, MSI_TYPE_DMAR, etc..
Each MSI type device should provide a private struct msi_driver. msi_driver should contain the type specific
MSI ops functions to help setup and enable MSI device, request MSI irq.
I almost finish the first draft, and will post out next week in plan :)
Thanks!
Yijing.
>
> Thanks
> -Bharat
>
>>
>> My patchset is just a RFC draft, I will update it later, all we want to do is
>> make kernel support Non-PCI MSI devices.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Yijing.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Arnab
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
>>> linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>>>
>>> .
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thanks!
>> Yijing
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body
>> of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at
>> http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
> .
>
--
Thanks!
Yijing
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-20 6:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-26 3:08 [RFC PATCH 00/11] Refactor MSI to support Non-PCI device Yijing Wang
2014-07-26 3:08 ` [RFC PATCH 01/11] PCI/MSI: Use pci_dev->msi_cap instead of msi_desc->msi_attrib.pos Yijing Wang
2014-07-26 3:08 ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-26 3:08 ` [RFC PATCH 02/11] PCI/MSI: Use new MSI type macro instead of PCI MSI flags Yijing Wang
2014-07-26 3:08 ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-26 3:08 ` [RFC PATCH 03/11] PCI/MSI: Refactor pci_dev_msi_enabled() Yijing Wang
2014-07-26 3:08 ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-05 22:35 ` Stuart Yoder
2014-08-05 22:35 ` Stuart Yoder
2014-08-06 1:23 ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-06 1:23 ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-20 5:57 ` Bharat.Bhushan
2014-08-20 5:57 ` Bharat.Bhushan
2014-08-20 6:30 ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-20 6:30 ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-26 3:08 ` [RFC PATCH 04/11] PCI/MSI: Move MSIX table address mapping out of msix_capability_init Yijing Wang
2014-07-26 3:08 ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-26 3:08 ` [RFC PATCH 05/11] PCI/MSI: Move populate_msi_sysfs() out of msi_capability_init() Yijing Wang
2014-07-26 3:08 ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-26 3:08 ` [RFC PATCH 06/11] PCI/MSI: Save MSI irq in PCI MSI layer Yijing Wang
2014-07-26 3:08 ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-26 3:08 ` [RFC PATCH 07/11] PCI/MSI: Mask MSI-X entry in msix_setup_entries() Yijing Wang
2014-07-26 3:08 ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-26 3:08 ` [RFC PATCH 08/11] PCI/MSI: Introduce new struct msi_irqs and struct msi_ops Yijing Wang
2014-07-26 3:08 ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-26 3:08 ` [RFC PATCH 09/11] PCI/MSI: refactor PCI MSI driver Yijing Wang
2014-07-26 3:08 ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-20 6:06 ` Bharat.Bhushan
2014-08-20 6:06 ` Bharat.Bhushan
2014-08-20 6:34 ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-20 6:34 ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-26 3:08 ` [RFC PATCH 10/11] PCI/MSI: Split the generic MSI code into new file Yijing Wang
2014-07-26 3:08 ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-20 6:18 ` Bharat.Bhushan
2014-08-20 6:18 ` Bharat.Bhushan
2014-08-20 6:43 ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-20 6:43 ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-26 3:08 ` [RFC PATCH 11/11] x86/MSI: Refactor x86 MSI code Yijing Wang
2014-07-26 3:08 ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-20 6:20 ` Bharat.Bhushan
2014-08-20 6:20 ` Bharat.Bhushan
2014-08-20 7:01 ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-29 14:08 ` [RFC PATCH 00/11] Refactor MSI to support Non-PCI device Arnd Bergmann
2014-07-29 14:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-07-30 2:45 ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-30 2:45 ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-30 6:47 ` Jiang Liu
2014-07-30 6:47 ` Jiang Liu
2014-07-30 7:20 ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-01 13:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-08-01 13:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-08-04 3:32 ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-04 3:32 ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-04 14:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-08-05 2:20 ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-05 2:20 ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-01 13:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-08-01 13:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-08-04 6:43 ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-04 6:43 ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-04 14:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-08-04 14:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-08-05 2:12 ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-05 2:12 ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-01 10:27 ` arnab.basu
2014-08-04 3:03 ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-04 3:03 ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-20 5:44 ` Bharat.Bhushan
2014-08-20 5:44 ` Bharat.Bhushan
2014-08-20 6:28 ` Yijing Wang [this message]
2014-08-20 6:28 ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-20 7:41 ` Bharat.Bhushan
2014-08-20 7:41 ` Bharat.Bhushan
2014-08-20 7:55 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-03 7:15 ` Yijing Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53F44022.6030706@huawei.com \
--to=wangyijing@huawei.com \
--cc=Bharat.Bhushan@freescale.com \
--cc=Paul.Mundt@huawei.com \
--cc=arnab.basu@freescale.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=huxinwei@huawei.com \
--cc=jejb@parisc-linux.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=wuyun.wu@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).