From: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
To: "Bharat.Bhushan@freescale.com" <Bharat.Bhushan@freescale.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Xinwei Hu <huxinwei@huawei.com>, Wuyun <wuyun.wu@huawei.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"Paul.Mundt@huawei.com" <Paul.Mundt@huawei.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
"arnab.basu@freescale.com" <arnab.basu@freescale.com>,
"virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 09/11] PCI/MSI: refactor PCI MSI driver
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 14:34:32 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53F44178.7070409@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5fe08f65ec1d40a98ca28389b7e37572@BLUPR03MB566.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
>> @@ -1025,21 +1059,52 @@ int pci_msi_enabled(void)
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_msi_enabled);
>>
>> -void pci_msi_init_pci_dev(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> +static struct msi_ops pci_msi = {
>> + .msi_set_enable = msi_set_enable,
>> + .msi_setup_entry = msi_setup_entry,
>> + .msix_setup_entries = msix_setup_entries,
>> + .msi_mask_irq = default_msi_mask_irq,
>> + .msix_mask_irq = default_msix_mask_irq,
>> + .msi_read_message = __read_msi_msg,
>> + .msi_write_message = __write_msi_msg,
>> + .msi_set_intx = pci_intx_for_msi,
>> +};
>
> Ahh, want to be sure I am understanding this correctly. So if I have a non-pci driver "xyz" which wants to use separate ops then I need to have a all these functions in that driver. Something like driver/xyz/msi.c
Yes, because different MSI device has different MSI hardware registers, so every MSI type should provide its own msi_ops, or its own msi_driver in my new proposal.
>
> Thanks
> -Bharat
>
>> +
>> +struct msi_irqs *alloc_msi_irqs(void *data, struct msi_ops *ops)
>> {
>> - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->msi_list);
>> + struct msi_irqs *msi;
>> +
>> + msi = kzalloc(sizeof(struct msi_irqs), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!msi)
>> + return NULL;
>>
>> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&msi->msi_list);
>> + msi->data = data;
>> + msi->ops = ops;
>> + return msi;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void pci_msi_init_pci_dev(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> +{
>> /* Disable the msi hardware to avoid screaming interrupts
>> * during boot. This is the power on reset default so
>> * usually this should be a noop.
>> */
>> dev->msi_cap = pci_find_capability(dev, PCI_CAP_ID_MSI);
>> - if (dev->msi_cap)
>> - msi_set_enable(dev, 0);
>> -
>> dev->msix_cap = pci_find_capability(dev, PCI_CAP_ID_MSIX);
>> - if (dev->msix_cap)
>> - msix_clear_and_set_ctrl(dev, PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_ENABLE, 0);
>> +
>> + if (dev->msi_cap || dev->msix_cap) {
>> + dev->msi = alloc_msi_irqs(dev, &pci_msi);
>> + if (!dev->msi)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + dev->msi->node = dev_to_node(&dev->dev);
>> + if (dev->msi_cap)
>> + msi_set_enable(dev->msi, 0, MSI_TYPE);
>> +
>> + if (dev->msix_cap)
>> + msi_set_enable(dev->msi, 0, MSIX_TYPE);
>> + }
>> }
>>
>> /**
>> @@ -1060,13 +1125,13 @@ int pci_enable_msi_range(struct pci_dev *dev, int
>> minvec, int maxvec)
>> int rc;
>> struct msi_desc *entry;
>>
>> - if (dev->current_state != PCI_D0)
>> + if (dev->current_state != PCI_D0 || !dev->msi)
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> - WARN_ON(!!dev->msi_enabled);
>> + WARN_ON(!!pci_dev_msi_enabled(dev, MSI_TYPE));
>>
>> /* Check whether driver already requested MSI-X irqs */
>> - if (dev->msix_enabled) {
>> + if (pci_dev_msi_enabled(dev, MSIX_TYPE)) {
>> dev_info(&dev->dev,
>> "can't enable MSI (MSI-X already enabled)\n");
>> return -EINVAL;
>> @@ -1095,7 +1160,7 @@ int pci_enable_msi_range(struct pci_dev *dev, int minvec,
>> int maxvec)
>> } while (rc);
>>
>> do {
>> - rc = msi_capability_init(dev, nvec);
>> + rc = msi_capability_init(dev->msi, nvec);
>> if (rc < 0) {
>> return rc;
>> } else if (rc > 0) {
>> @@ -1107,14 +1172,14 @@ int pci_enable_msi_range(struct pci_dev *dev, int
>> minvec, int maxvec)
>>
>> rc = populate_msi_sysfs(dev);
>> if (rc) {
>> - msi_set_enable(dev, 0);
>> - pci_intx_for_msi(dev, 1);
>> - dev->msi_enabled = 0;
>> - free_msi_irqs(dev);
>> + msi_set_enable(dev->msi, 0, MSI_TYPE);
>> + pci_intx_for_msi(dev->msi, 1);
>> + dev->msi->msi_enabled = 0;
>> + free_msi_irqs(dev->msi);
>> return rc;
>> }
>>
>> - entry = list_entry(dev->msi_list.next, struct msi_desc, list);
>> + entry = list_entry(dev->msi->msi_list.next, struct msi_desc, list);
>> dev->irq = entry->irq;
>> return nvec;
>> }
>> @@ -1158,3 +1223,5 @@ int pci_enable_msix_range(struct pci_dev *dev, struct
>> msix_entry *entries,
>> return nvec;
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_enable_msix_range);
>> +
>> +
>> diff --git a/include/linux/msi.h b/include/linux/msi.h
>> index 5a672d3..fc8f3e8 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/msi.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/msi.h
>> @@ -83,15 +83,15 @@ struct msi_desc {
>> * implemented as weak symbols so that they /can/ be overriden by
>> * architecture specific code if needed.
>> */
>> -int arch_setup_msi_irq(struct pci_dev *dev, struct msi_desc *desc);
>> +int arch_setup_msi_irq(struct msi_irqs *msi, struct msi_desc *desc);
>> void arch_teardown_msi_irq(unsigned int irq);
>> -int arch_setup_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, int type);
>> -void arch_teardown_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev);
>> -int arch_msi_check_device(struct pci_dev* dev, int nvec, int type);
>> -void arch_restore_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev);
>> +int arch_setup_msi_irqs(struct msi_irqs *msi, int nvec, int type);
>> +void arch_teardown_msi_irqs(struct msi_irqs *msi);
>> +int arch_msi_check_device(struct msi_irqs *msi, int nvec, int type);
>> +void arch_restore_msi_irqs(struct msi_irqs *msi);
>>
>> -void default_teardown_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev);
>> -void default_restore_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev);
>> +void default_teardown_msi_irqs(struct msi_irqs *msi);
>> +void default_restore_msi_irqs(struct msi_irqs *msi);
>> u32 default_msi_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 mask, u32 flag);
>> u32 default_msix_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 flag);
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
>> index c7bca1c..d7126fc 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
>> @@ -334,8 +334,6 @@ struct pci_dev {
>> unsigned int block_cfg_access:1; /* config space access is blocked */
>> unsigned int broken_parity_status:1; /* Device generates false positive
>> parity */
>> unsigned int irq_reroute_variant:2; /* device needs IRQ rerouting
>> variant */
>> - unsigned int msi_enabled:1;
>> - unsigned int msix_enabled:1;
>> unsigned int ari_enabled:1; /* ARI forwarding */
>> unsigned int is_managed:1;
>> unsigned int needs_freset:1; /* Dev requires fundamental reset */
>> @@ -358,7 +356,7 @@ struct pci_dev {
>> struct bin_attribute *res_attr[DEVICE_COUNT_RESOURCE]; /* sysfs file for
>> resources */
>> struct bin_attribute *res_attr_wc[DEVICE_COUNT_RESOURCE]; /* sysfs file
>> for WC mapping of resources */
>> #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
>> - struct list_head msi_list;
>> + struct msi_irqs *msi;
>> const struct attribute_group **msi_irq_groups;
>> #endif
>> struct pci_vpd *vpd;
>> @@ -510,11 +508,14 @@ static inline struct pci_dev *pci_upstream_bridge(struct
>> pci_dev *dev)
>> static inline bool pci_dev_msi_enabled(struct pci_dev *pci_dev, int type)
>> {
>> bool enabled = 0;
>> +
>> + if (!pci_dev->msi)
>> + return false;
>>
>> if (type & MSI_TYPE)
>> - enabled |= pci_dev->msi_enabled;
>> + enabled |= pci_dev->msi->msi_enabled;
>> if (type & MSIX_TYPE)
>> - enabled |= pci_dev->msix_enabled;
>> + enabled |= pci_dev->msi->msix_enabled;
>>
>> return enabled;
>> }
>> --
>> 1.7.1
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
> .
>
--
Thanks!
Yijing
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-20 6:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-26 3:08 [RFC PATCH 00/11] Refactor MSI to support Non-PCI device Yijing Wang
2014-07-26 3:08 ` [RFC PATCH 01/11] PCI/MSI: Use pci_dev->msi_cap instead of msi_desc->msi_attrib.pos Yijing Wang
2014-07-26 3:08 ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-26 3:08 ` [RFC PATCH 02/11] PCI/MSI: Use new MSI type macro instead of PCI MSI flags Yijing Wang
2014-07-26 3:08 ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-26 3:08 ` [RFC PATCH 03/11] PCI/MSI: Refactor pci_dev_msi_enabled() Yijing Wang
2014-07-26 3:08 ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-05 22:35 ` Stuart Yoder
2014-08-05 22:35 ` Stuart Yoder
2014-08-06 1:23 ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-06 1:23 ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-20 5:57 ` Bharat.Bhushan
2014-08-20 5:57 ` Bharat.Bhushan
2014-08-20 6:30 ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-20 6:30 ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-26 3:08 ` [RFC PATCH 04/11] PCI/MSI: Move MSIX table address mapping out of msix_capability_init Yijing Wang
2014-07-26 3:08 ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-26 3:08 ` [RFC PATCH 05/11] PCI/MSI: Move populate_msi_sysfs() out of msi_capability_init() Yijing Wang
2014-07-26 3:08 ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-26 3:08 ` [RFC PATCH 06/11] PCI/MSI: Save MSI irq in PCI MSI layer Yijing Wang
2014-07-26 3:08 ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-26 3:08 ` [RFC PATCH 07/11] PCI/MSI: Mask MSI-X entry in msix_setup_entries() Yijing Wang
2014-07-26 3:08 ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-26 3:08 ` [RFC PATCH 08/11] PCI/MSI: Introduce new struct msi_irqs and struct msi_ops Yijing Wang
2014-07-26 3:08 ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-26 3:08 ` [RFC PATCH 09/11] PCI/MSI: refactor PCI MSI driver Yijing Wang
2014-07-26 3:08 ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-20 6:06 ` Bharat.Bhushan
2014-08-20 6:06 ` Bharat.Bhushan
2014-08-20 6:34 ` Yijing Wang [this message]
2014-08-20 6:34 ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-26 3:08 ` [RFC PATCH 10/11] PCI/MSI: Split the generic MSI code into new file Yijing Wang
2014-07-26 3:08 ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-20 6:18 ` Bharat.Bhushan
2014-08-20 6:18 ` Bharat.Bhushan
2014-08-20 6:43 ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-20 6:43 ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-26 3:08 ` [RFC PATCH 11/11] x86/MSI: Refactor x86 MSI code Yijing Wang
2014-07-26 3:08 ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-20 6:20 ` Bharat.Bhushan
2014-08-20 6:20 ` Bharat.Bhushan
2014-08-20 7:01 ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-29 14:08 ` [RFC PATCH 00/11] Refactor MSI to support Non-PCI device Arnd Bergmann
2014-07-29 14:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-07-30 2:45 ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-30 2:45 ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-30 6:47 ` Jiang Liu
2014-07-30 6:47 ` Jiang Liu
2014-07-30 7:20 ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-01 13:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-08-01 13:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-08-04 3:32 ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-04 3:32 ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-04 14:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-08-05 2:20 ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-05 2:20 ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-01 13:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-08-01 13:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-08-04 6:43 ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-04 6:43 ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-04 14:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-08-04 14:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-08-05 2:12 ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-05 2:12 ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-01 10:27 ` arnab.basu
2014-08-04 3:03 ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-04 3:03 ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-20 5:44 ` Bharat.Bhushan
2014-08-20 5:44 ` Bharat.Bhushan
2014-08-20 6:28 ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-20 6:28 ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-20 7:41 ` Bharat.Bhushan
2014-08-20 7:41 ` Bharat.Bhushan
2014-08-20 7:55 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-03 7:15 ` Yijing Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53F44178.7070409@huawei.com \
--to=wangyijing@huawei.com \
--cc=Bharat.Bhushan@freescale.com \
--cc=Paul.Mundt@huawei.com \
--cc=arnab.basu@freescale.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=huxinwei@huawei.com \
--cc=jejb@parisc-linux.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=wuyun.wu@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).