From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Vrabel Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v1 08/21] x86/xen/MSI: Use MSI chip framework to configure MSI/MSI-X irq Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 15:29:20 +0100 Message-ID: <5409C8C0.8020200@citrix.com> References: <1409911806-10519-1-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com> <1409911806-10519-9-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1409911806-10519-9-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com> Sender: linux-ia64-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Yijing Wang , Bjorn Helgaas Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Bharat.Bhushan@freescale.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Russell King , Joerg Roedel , x86@kernel.org, Sebastian Ott , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, arnab.basu@freescale.com, Arnd Bergmann , Chris Metcalf , Thomas Gleixner , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Xinwei Hu , Tony Luck , Ralf Baechle , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Wuyun , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "David S. Miller" List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On 05/09/14 11:09, Yijing Wang wrote: > Use MSI chip framework instead of arch MSI functions to configure > MSI/MSI-X irq. So we can manage MSI/MSI-X irq in a unified framework. [...] > --- a/arch/x86/pci/xen.c > +++ b/arch/x86/pci/xen.c [...] > @@ -418,9 +430,9 @@ int __init pci_xen_init(void) > #endif > > #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI > - x86_msi.setup_msi_irqs = xen_setup_msi_irqs; > - x86_msi.teardown_msi_irq = xen_teardown_msi_irq; > - x86_msi.teardown_msi_irqs = xen_teardown_msi_irqs; > + xen_msi_chip.setup_irqs = xen_setup_msi_irqs; > + xen_msi_chip.teardown_irqs = xen_teardown_msi_irqs; > + x86_msi_chip = &xen_msi_chip; > msi_chip.irq_mask = xen_nop_msi_mask; > msi_chip.irq_unmask = xen_nop_msi_mask; Why have these not been changed to set the x86_msi_chip.mask/unmask fields instead? David From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.citrix.com ([66.165.176.89]:58413 "EHLO SMTP.CITRIX.COM" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751471AbaIEO30 (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Sep 2014 10:29:26 -0400 Message-ID: <5409C8C0.8020200@citrix.com> Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 15:29:20 +0100 From: David Vrabel MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v1 08/21] x86/xen/MSI: Use MSI chip framework to configure MSI/MSI-X irq References: <1409911806-10519-1-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com> <1409911806-10519-9-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <1409911806-10519-9-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Yijing Wang , Bjorn Helgaas Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Bharat.Bhushan@freescale.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Russell King , Joerg Roedel , x86@kernel.org, Sebastian Ott , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, arnab.basu@freescale.com, Arnd Bergmann , Chris Metcalf , Thomas Gleixner , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Xinwei Hu , Tony Luck , Ralf Baechle , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Wuyun , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "David S. Miller" Message-ID: <20140905142920.ywqw9AFGoSBEkhZGyfBtvMN-s_xZ33VjmpFM__obKBE@z> On 05/09/14 11:09, Yijing Wang wrote: > Use MSI chip framework instead of arch MSI functions to configure > MSI/MSI-X irq. So we can manage MSI/MSI-X irq in a unified framework. [...] > --- a/arch/x86/pci/xen.c > +++ b/arch/x86/pci/xen.c [...] > @@ -418,9 +430,9 @@ int __init pci_xen_init(void) > #endif > > #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI > - x86_msi.setup_msi_irqs = xen_setup_msi_irqs; > - x86_msi.teardown_msi_irq = xen_teardown_msi_irq; > - x86_msi.teardown_msi_irqs = xen_teardown_msi_irqs; > + xen_msi_chip.setup_irqs = xen_setup_msi_irqs; > + xen_msi_chip.teardown_irqs = xen_teardown_msi_irqs; > + x86_msi_chip = &xen_msi_chip; > msi_chip.irq_mask = xen_nop_msi_mask; > msi_chip.irq_unmask = xen_nop_msi_mask; Why have these not been changed to set the x86_msi_chip.mask/unmask fields instead? David