linux-arch.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
To: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-pci <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Tanmay Inamdar <tinamdar@apm.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
	Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>,
	Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
	Suravee Suthikulanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
	linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Device Tree ML <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	LAKML <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	grant.likely@linaro.or
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 07/10] OF: Introduce helper function for getting PCI domain_nr
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 17:30:51 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <540EC8CB.7010106@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140909084621.GS27864@e106497-lin.cambridge.arm.com>

On 2014/9/9 16:46, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 06:54:21AM +0100, Yijing Wang wrote:
>>>>> on new requests. This function gets called quite a lot and I'm trying not to
>>>>> make it too heavy weight.
>>>>
>>>> Generally, nothing should be accessing the same DT value frequently.
>>>> It should get cached somewhere.
>>>>
>>>
>>> The problem appears for DTs that don't have the pci-domain info. Then the cached
>>> value is left at the default non-valid value and attempts to rescan the DT will
>>> be made every time the function is called.
>>>
>>>> I don't really understand how domains are used so it's hard to provide
>>>> a recommendation here. Do domains even belong in the DT?
>>>
>>> ACPI calls them segments and the way Bjorn explained it to me at some moment was
>>> that it was an attempt to split up a bus in different groups (or alternatively,
>>> merge a few busses together). To be honest I haven't seen systems where the domain
>>> is anything other than zero, but JasonG (or maybe Benjamin) were floating an
>>> idea of using the domain number to identify physical slots.
>>
>> PCI domain(or named segment) is provided by firmware, in ACPI system, we evaluated it
>> by method "_SEG". in IA64 with ACPI, PCI hostbridge driver retrieves the domain from ACPI,
>> if it's absent, the default domain is zero. So I wonder why in DTS, if it's absent, we get
>> a auto increment domain value.
> 
> Because you can have more than one hostbridge (rare, but not impossible) and unless you
> want to join the two segments, you might want to give it a different domain.

OK. Sorry, I have one last question, because domain will be used to calculate the address used to
access PCI hardware config registers. So if DTS file doesn't report the domain, how do we know
we would access the right registers when we use the auto increment domain vaule ?
Has there a mechanism to make sure system can access the correct registers by the domain ?

Thanks!
Yijing.

> 
> Best regards,
> Liviu
> 
>>
>> PCI get domain by ACPI "_SEG" in IA64(drivers/acpi/pci_root.c)
>> ......
>> 	status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, METHOD_NAME__SEG, NULL,
>> 				       &segment);
>> 	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) && status != AE_NOT_FOUND) {
>> 		dev_err(&device->dev,  "can't evaluate _SEG\n");
>> 		result = -ENODEV;
>> 		goto end;
>> 	}
>> .......
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Yijing.
>>
>>>
>>>> This function
>>>> is just a weird mixture of data retrieval and allocation. I think you
>>>> need to separate it into 2 functions.
>>>
>>> It is meant to do allocation with the retrieval being a short-cut (or fine
>>> control if you want).
>>>
>>> I need to think a bit more for a better solution.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Liviu
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Rob
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Thanks!
>> Yijing
>>
>>
> 


-- 
Thanks!
Yijing

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
To: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-pci <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Tanmay Inamdar <tinamdar@apm.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
	Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>,
	Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
	Suravee Suthikulanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
	linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Device Tree ML <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	LAKML <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"grant.likely@linaro.org" <grant.likely@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 07/10] OF: Introduce helper function for getting PCI domain_nr
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 17:30:51 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <540EC8CB.7010106@huawei.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20140909093051.0TlKHN-VVhZoele5Bh2O8BuDhHTvQiu3tLdYo7gTgpA@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140909084621.GS27864@e106497-lin.cambridge.arm.com>

On 2014/9/9 16:46, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 06:54:21AM +0100, Yijing Wang wrote:
>>>>> on new requests. This function gets called quite a lot and I'm trying not to
>>>>> make it too heavy weight.
>>>>
>>>> Generally, nothing should be accessing the same DT value frequently.
>>>> It should get cached somewhere.
>>>>
>>>
>>> The problem appears for DTs that don't have the pci-domain info. Then the cached
>>> value is left at the default non-valid value and attempts to rescan the DT will
>>> be made every time the function is called.
>>>
>>>> I don't really understand how domains are used so it's hard to provide
>>>> a recommendation here. Do domains even belong in the DT?
>>>
>>> ACPI calls them segments and the way Bjorn explained it to me at some moment was
>>> that it was an attempt to split up a bus in different groups (or alternatively,
>>> merge a few busses together). To be honest I haven't seen systems where the domain
>>> is anything other than zero, but JasonG (or maybe Benjamin) were floating an
>>> idea of using the domain number to identify physical slots.
>>
>> PCI domain(or named segment) is provided by firmware, in ACPI system, we evaluated it
>> by method "_SEG". in IA64 with ACPI, PCI hostbridge driver retrieves the domain from ACPI,
>> if it's absent, the default domain is zero. So I wonder why in DTS, if it's absent, we get
>> a auto increment domain value.
> 
> Because you can have more than one hostbridge (rare, but not impossible) and unless you
> want to join the two segments, you might want to give it a different domain.

OK. Sorry, I have one last question, because domain will be used to calculate the address used to
access PCI hardware config registers. So if DTS file doesn't report the domain, how do we know
we would access the right registers when we use the auto increment domain vaule ?
Has there a mechanism to make sure system can access the correct registers by the domain ?

Thanks!
Yijing.

> 
> Best regards,
> Liviu
> 
>>
>> PCI get domain by ACPI "_SEG" in IA64(drivers/acpi/pci_root.c)
>> ......
>> 	status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, METHOD_NAME__SEG, NULL,
>> 				       &segment);
>> 	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) && status != AE_NOT_FOUND) {
>> 		dev_err(&device->dev,  "can't evaluate _SEG\n");
>> 		result = -ENODEV;
>> 		goto end;
>> 	}
>> .......
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Yijing.
>>
>>>
>>>> This function
>>>> is just a weird mixture of data retrieval and allocation. I think you
>>>> need to separate it into 2 functions.
>>>
>>> It is meant to do allocation with the retrieval being a short-cut (or fine
>>> control if you want).
>>>
>>> I need to think a bit more for a better solution.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Liviu
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Rob
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Thanks!
>> Yijing
>>
>>
> 


-- 
Thanks!
Yijing


  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-09-09  9:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-08 13:54 [PATCH v10 00/10] Support for creating generic PCI host bridges from DT Liviu Dudau
2014-09-08 13:54 ` Liviu Dudau
2014-09-08 13:54 ` [PATCH v10 01/10] Fix ioport_map() for !CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP cases Liviu Dudau
2014-09-08 13:54   ` Liviu Dudau
2014-09-08 13:54 ` [PATCH v10 02/10] PCI: Introduce helper functions to deal with PCI I/O ranges Liviu Dudau
2014-09-08 13:54   ` Liviu Dudau
2014-09-08 13:54 ` [PATCH v10 03/10] ARM: Define PCI_IOBASE as the base of virtual PCI IO space Liviu Dudau
2014-09-08 13:54   ` Liviu Dudau
2014-09-08 13:54 ` [PATCH v10 04/10] PCI: OF: Fix the conversion of IO ranges into IO resources Liviu Dudau
2014-09-08 13:54   ` Liviu Dudau
2014-09-08 13:54 ` [PATCH v10 05/10] PCI: Create pci_host_bridge before its associated bus in pci_create_root_bus Liviu Dudau
2014-09-08 13:54   ` Liviu Dudau
2014-09-08 13:54 ` [PATCH v10 06/10] PCI: Introduce generic domain handling for PCI busses Liviu Dudau
2014-09-08 13:54   ` Liviu Dudau
2014-09-08 14:03   ` Catalin Marinas
2014-09-08 14:03     ` Catalin Marinas
2014-09-08 14:05     ` Liviu Dudau
2014-09-08 14:05       ` Liviu Dudau
2014-09-08 13:54 ` [PATCH v10 07/10] OF: Introduce helper function for getting PCI domain_nr Liviu Dudau
2014-09-08 13:54   ` Liviu Dudau
2014-09-08 14:27   ` Rob Herring
2014-09-08 14:27     ` Rob Herring
2014-09-08 14:54     ` Liviu Dudau
2014-09-08 15:27       ` Rob Herring
2014-09-08 15:59         ` Liviu Dudau
2014-09-08 16:39           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-09-09  5:54           ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-09  8:46             ` Liviu Dudau
2014-09-09  8:46               ` Liviu Dudau
     [not found]               ` <20140909084621.GS27864-2JSQmVVBSi7ZROr8t4l/smS4ubULX0JqMm0uRHvK7Nw@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-09  9:16                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-09  9:16                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-09 11:20                   ` Catalin Marinas
2014-09-09 11:20                     ` Catalin Marinas
2014-09-10 18:19                     ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-10 18:19                       ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-11 14:11                       ` Phil Edworthy
2014-09-11 14:11                         ` Phil Edworthy
2014-09-11 14:49                         ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-11 14:49                           ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-09 14:17                   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-09-09 14:17                     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-09-09  9:30               ` Yijing Wang [this message]
2014-09-09  9:30                 ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-09 14:11                 ` Liviu Dudau
2014-09-09 14:11                   ` Liviu Dudau
2014-09-10  1:44                   ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-10  1:44                     ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-09 14:26                 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-09-09 14:26                   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-09-09 15:41                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-09-09 15:41                     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-09-10  2:44                     ` Rob Herring
2014-09-10  2:44                       ` Rob Herring
2014-09-10 16:32                       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-09-10 16:32                         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-09-10  1:55                   ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-10  1:55                     ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-10 13:04           ` Liviu Dudau
2014-09-10 13:04             ` Liviu Dudau
2014-09-08 13:54 ` [PATCH v10 08/10] OF: PCI: Add support for parsing PCI host bridge resources from DT Liviu Dudau
2014-09-08 13:54   ` Liviu Dudau
2014-09-09 13:35   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-09-09 13:35     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-09-10 14:22     ` Liviu Dudau
2014-09-10 14:22       ` Liviu Dudau
2014-09-10 15:10       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-09-10 15:10         ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-09-10 15:32         ` Liviu Dudau
2014-09-10 15:32           ` Liviu Dudau
2014-09-10 16:37           ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-09-10 16:37             ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
     [not found]             ` <20140910163746.GB19662-7AyDDHkRsp3ZROr8t4l/smS4ubULX0JqMm0uRHvK7Nw@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-10 16:53               ` Liviu Dudau
2014-09-10 16:53                 ` Liviu Dudau
2014-09-10 17:06                 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-09-10 17:06                   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-09-08 13:54 ` [PATCH v10 09/10] PCI: Assign unassigned bus resources in pci_scan_root_bus() Liviu Dudau
2014-09-08 13:54   ` Liviu Dudau
2014-09-12 10:13   ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2014-09-12 10:13     ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2014-09-12 10:34     ` Liviu Dudau
2014-09-08 13:54 ` [PATCH v10 10/10] PCI: Introduce pci_remap_iospace() for remapping PCI I/O bus resources into CPU space Liviu Dudau
2014-09-08 13:54   ` Liviu Dudau
     [not found] ` <1410184472-17630-1-git-send-email-Liviu.Dudau-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-08 16:07   ` [PATCH v10 00/10] Support for creating generic PCI host bridges from DT Liviu Dudau
2014-09-08 16:07     ` Liviu Dudau
2014-09-12  8:25 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2014-09-12  8:25   ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2014-09-12  9:30   ` Liviu Dudau
2014-09-12  9:30     ` Liviu Dudau
2014-09-12 10:00     ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2014-09-12 10:00       ` Suravee Suthikulpanit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=540EC8CB.7010106@huawei.com \
    --to=wangyijing@huawei.com \
    --cc=Catalin.Marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=Liviu.Dudau@arm.com \
    --cc=Will.Deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@linaro.or \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=jg1.han@samsung.com \
    --cc=jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com \
    --cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=okaya@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=robherring2@gmail.com \
    --cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=tinamdar@apm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).