public inbox for linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Jeff Epler <jepler@unpythonic.net>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>,
	Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>,
	linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xtensa: Fix execdomain removal
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 08:00:47 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <552A889F.6050307@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150412144346.GD7215@unpythonic.net>

On 04/12/2015 07:43 AM, Jeff Epler wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 07:19:51PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> The removal of exexdomain changes pointer offsets into the thread_info
>> structure.
> ...
>> -#define TI_EXEC_DOMAIN	 0x00000004
>> -#define TI_FLAGS	 0x00000008
>> +#define TI_FLAGS	 0x00000004
>
> Hmm.  If these have to be maintained by hand, perhaps they can be
> BUILD_BUG_ON'd in some appropriate C file?  e.g.,
>
>      BUILD_BUG_ON(TI_FLAGS != offsetof(struct thread_info, flags));
>
> Jeff
>
Other architectures use either DEFINE or OFFSET macros to define
those flags, so that would probably be a better solution if something
more fancy is asked for. That should probably be a separate patch,
though.

Guenter

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-04-12 15:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-12  2:19 [PATCH] xtensa: Fix execdomain removal Guenter Roeck
2015-04-12 14:43 ` Jeff Epler
2015-04-12 14:43   ` Jeff Epler
2015-04-12 15:00   ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2015-04-12 15:00     ` Guenter Roeck
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-04-12 14:58 Richard Weinberger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=552A889F.6050307@roeck-us.net \
    --to=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=chris@zankel.net \
    --cc=jcmvbkbc@gmail.com \
    --cc=jepler@unpythonic.net \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox