From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Guenter Roeck Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/17] Re-introduce h8300 architecture Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 21:33:12 -0700 Message-ID: <55405F08.7020508@roeck-us.net> References: <1430112924-1134-1-git-send-email-ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> <20150428132210.GA7499@roeck-us.net> <87pp6oi2qy.wl-ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from bh-25.webhostbox.net ([208.91.199.152]:41288 "EHLO bh-25.webhostbox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751371AbbD2EdP (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Apr 2015 00:33:15 -0400 Received: from mailnull by bh-25.webhostbox.net with sa-checked (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1YnJgQ-000Elo-BC for linux-arch@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 04:33:14 +0000 In-Reply-To: <87pp6oi2qy.wl-ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Yoshinori Sato Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org On 04/28/2015 10:25 AM, Yoshinori Sato wrote: > At Tue, 28 Apr 2015 06:22:10 -0700, > Guenter Roeck wrote: >> >> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 02:35:07PM +0900, Yoshinori Sato wrote: >>> Hello. >>> I will re-introducing h8300. >>> >> >> Hi, >> >> can you provide a link to a working toolchain, or provide directions >> on how to build one ? > > h8300-unknown-linux in gcc / binutils development version. > Patch of a release version has not been prepared yet. > Hi, With a toolchain based on binutils 2.25 (patched), gcc 5.1 (unpatched), and newlib 1.20 (unpatched), I get for both h8300h-sim_defconfig and h8s-sim_defconfig: ./arch/h8300/kernel/vmlinux.lds:247: undefined symbol `jiffies_64' referenced in expression I had to modify arch/h8300/Makefile a bit since the linker does not understand -mh8300helf_linux and -mh8300self_linux; I had to use -mh8300helf and -mh8300self instead. Maybe I am missing a binutils patch. I also had to use h8300-linux-elf as target to convince gcc to accept it as valid target. Both should not result in the undefined symbol error, though. Guenter