From: Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
To: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Brett Rudley <brudley@broadcom.com>,
"Franky (Zhenhui) Lin" <frankyl@broadcom.com>,
Hante Meuleman <meuleman@broadcom.com>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
Pieter-Paul Giesberts <pieterpg@broadcom.com>,
Daniel Kim <dekim@broadcom.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, brcm80211-dev-list@broadcom.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] brcmfmac: dhd_sdio.c: use existing atomic_or primitive
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 20:31:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <559EBDF4.7030808@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <559EBC91.2070600@broadcom.com>
On 07/09/2015 08:25 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> On 07/09/2015 10:13 AM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>> There's already a generic implementation so use that instead.
>
> There is or there was? If there is now I am fine with this patch, but if
> it already was there the author might have had a reason for adding a
> local function and I would like to hear that reason.
Nevermind. Just noticed you are proposing the generic implementation in
this series. Currently on vacation and want to discuss with Hante about
this change.
Regards,
Arend
>> ---
>> I'm not sure if the driver usage of atomic_or?() is correct in terms of
>> storage size of @val for 64 bit arches.
>>
>> Assuming LP64 programming model for linux on say x86_64: atomic_or()
>> callers in this driver use long (sana 64 bit) storage and pass it to
>> atomic_orr/atomic_or which downcasts it to 32 bits. Is that OK ?
>
> The function is used with 32bit register value from the device so I
> think it is ok.
>
> Regards,
> Arend
>
>> ---
>> Cc: Brett Rudley <brudley@broadcom.com>
>> Cc: Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
>> Cc: "Franky (Zhenhui) Lin" <frankyl@broadcom.com>
>> Cc: Hante Meuleman <meuleman@broadcom.com>
>> Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
>> Cc: Pieter-Paul Giesberts <pieterpg@broadcom.com>
>> Cc: Daniel Kim <dekim@broadcom.com>
>> Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: brcm80211-dev-list@broadcom.com
>> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
>> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c | 13 ++-----------
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c
>> b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c
>> index d36f5f3d931b..f990e3d0e696 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c
>> @@ -2564,15 +2564,6 @@ static inline void brcmf_sdio_clrintr(struct
>> brcmf_sdio *bus)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> -static void atomic_orr(int val, atomic_t *v)
>> -{
>> - int old_val;
>> -
>> - old_val = atomic_read(v);
>> - while (atomic_cmpxchg(v, old_val, val | old_val) != old_val)
>> - old_val = atomic_read(v);
>> -}
>> -
>> static int brcmf_sdio_intr_rstatus(struct brcmf_sdio *bus)
>> {
>> struct brcmf_core *buscore;
>> @@ -2595,7 +2586,7 @@ static int brcmf_sdio_intr_rstatus(struct
>> brcmf_sdio *bus)
>> if (val) {
>> brcmf_sdiod_regwl(bus->sdiodev, addr, val, &ret);
>> bus->sdcnt.f1regdata++;
>> - atomic_orr(val, &bus->intstatus);
>> + atomic_or(val, &bus->intstatus);
>> }
>>
>> return ret;
>> @@ -2712,7 +2703,7 @@ static void brcmf_sdio_dpc(struct brcmf_sdio *bus)
>>
>> /* Keep still-pending events for next scheduling */
>> if (intstatus)
>> - atomic_orr(intstatus, &bus->intstatus);
>> + atomic_or(intstatus, &bus->intstatus);
>>
>> brcmf_sdio_clrintr(bus);
>>
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-09 18:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-09 8:13 [PATCH 0/3] atomic_or() related changes Vineet Gupta
2015-07-09 8:13 ` [PATCH 1/3] asm-generic/atomic.h: ARCH_HAS_ATOMIC_OR -> CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_ATOMIC_OR Vineet Gupta
2015-07-09 8:13 ` [PATCH 2/3] brcmfmac: dhd_sdio.c: use existing atomic_or primitive Vineet Gupta
2015-07-09 18:25 ` Arend van Spriel
2015-07-09 18:31 ` Arend van Spriel [this message]
2015-07-09 19:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-10 4:49 ` Vineet Gupta
2015-07-10 9:05 ` Arend van Spriel
2015-07-10 9:05 ` Arend van Spriel
2015-07-24 17:02 ` Kalle Valo
2015-07-24 17:22 ` Vineet Gupta
2015-07-24 17:22 ` Vineet Gupta
2015-07-26 11:12 ` Arend van Spriel
2015-07-26 11:12 ` Arend van Spriel
2015-07-27 10:08 ` Kalle Valo
2015-07-27 10:08 ` Kalle Valo
2015-07-27 10:23 ` Vineet Gupta
2015-08-13 12:30 ` [2/3] " Kalle Valo
2015-08-13 12:30 ` Kalle Valo
2015-07-09 8:13 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARC: provide atomic_or() and define ARCH_HAS_ATOMIC_OR Vineet Gupta
2015-07-09 12:31 ` [PATCH 0/3] atomic_or() related changes Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-09 13:05 ` Vineet Gupta
2015-07-09 13:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=559EBDF4.7030808@broadcom.com \
--to=arend@broadcom.com \
--cc=Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=brcm80211-dev-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=brudley@broadcom.com \
--cc=dekim@broadcom.com \
--cc=frankyl@broadcom.com \
--cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=meuleman@broadcom.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pieterpg@broadcom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).