From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Vrabel Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 1/3] drivers/xen/preempt: use need_resched() instead of should_resched() Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 14:41:42 +0100 Message-ID: <55ACFA96.9060102@citrix.com> References: <20150715095201.12246.49283.stgit@buzz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp02.citrix.com ([66.165.176.63]:46194 "EHLO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753024AbbGTNlq (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jul 2015 09:41:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20150715095201.12246.49283.stgit@buzz> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Konstantin Khlebnikov , Peter Zijlstra Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Graf , Paul Mackerras , David Vrabel , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Boris Ostrovsky , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org On 15/07/15 10:52, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: > This code is used only when CONFIG_PREEMPT=n and only in non-atomic context: > xen_in_preemptible_hcall is set only in privcmd_ioctl_hypercall(). > Thus preempt_count is zero and should_resched() is equal to need_resched(). Applied to for-linus-4.3, thanks. David