From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: nios2: is the ptrace ABI correct? Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 09:54:10 +0100 Message-ID: <5636312.0WGrbVlVgB@wuerfel> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.130]:64139 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751973AbbBXIyW (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Feb 2015 03:54:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Ezequiel Garcia Cc: Tobias Klauser , Chung-Ling Tang , Walter Goossens , Ley Foon Tan , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, "nios2-dev@lists.rocketboards.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" On Tuesday 24 February 2015 00:04:21 Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > So, tried a different approach and removed pt_regs from the UAPI ptrace.h, > replacing it with a new user_regs that describes how registers are passed > to user. This however is also problematic, as pt_regs is already used > by glibc (not really sure what for). > I've looked at glibc and could not find a use for pt_regs there. Where did you find it? It's quite possible that it's incorrect as well if the structures don't match. Arnd