From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arjan van de Ven Subject: Re: S3 resume regression [1cf4f629d9d2 ("cpu/hotplug: Move online calls to hotplugged cpu")] Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 05:44:14 -0700 Message-ID: <5733291E.80001@linux.intel.com> References: <20160511101920.GZ4329@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mga14.intel.com ([192.55.52.115]:33434 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752476AbcEKMoR (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 May 2016 08:44:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20160511101920.GZ4329@intel.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: =?UTF-8?B?VmlsbGUgU3lyasOkbMOk?= , Thomas Gleixner Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Rik van Riel , Rafael Wysocki , "Srivatsa S. Bhat" , Peter Zijlstra , Sebastian Siewior , Rusty Russell , Steven Rostedt , Oleg Nesterov , Tejun Heo , Andrew Morton , Paul McKenney , Linus Torvalds , Paul Turner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rui.zhang@intel.com, len.brown@intel.com On 5/11/2016 3:19 AM, Ville Syrj=E4l=E4 wrote: > Oh, and this was with acpi_idle. This machine already failed to > resume from S3 with intel_idle since forever, as detailed in > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107151 > but acpi_idle worked fine until now. this is the important clue part afaics. some of these very old Atom's had issues (bios?) with S3 if the cores w= ere in a too-deep C state, and at some point there was a workaround (I forgot where in the code) t= o ban those deep C states around S3 on those cpus. I wonder if moving things around has = made said workaround ineffective.....