From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Hansen Subject: Re: Build failures in -next: sys_pkey_mprotect etc. undefined Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 13:34:54 -0700 Message-ID: <57D7116E.4050708@linux.intel.com> References: <9d74497b-1522-b350-42fa-49df2df48c4a@roeck-us.net> <57D70B6D.6010208@linux.intel.com> <3540553.8BkpiafJJ2@wuerfel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <3540553.8BkpiafJJ2@wuerfel> Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Guenter Roeck , Thomas Gleixner , "open list:ABI/API" , linux-arch , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On 09/12/2016 01:28 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > FWIW, you should be able to test this with an arm64 cross-compiler > too, many distros ship one. arm64 build fine for me with and without the patch. There must be something else specific to h8300 and the other broken architectures. Is there some other part of the configuration that could be hiding the issue in my arm64 build? From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga04.intel.com ([192.55.52.120]:27107 "EHLO mga04.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750832AbcILUe4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Sep 2016 16:34:56 -0400 Subject: Re: Build failures in -next: sys_pkey_mprotect etc. undefined References: <9d74497b-1522-b350-42fa-49df2df48c4a@roeck-us.net> <57D70B6D.6010208@linux.intel.com> <3540553.8BkpiafJJ2@wuerfel> From: Dave Hansen Message-ID: <57D7116E.4050708@linux.intel.com> Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 13:34:54 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3540553.8BkpiafJJ2@wuerfel> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Guenter Roeck , Thomas Gleixner , "open list:ABI/API" , linux-arch , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20160912203454.PahYrCA14CcUmZ9Q0bD3P8dhgGDXj0D1U2ohzRKEiYY@z> On 09/12/2016 01:28 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > FWIW, you should be able to test this with an arm64 cross-compiler > too, many distros ship one. arm64 build fine for me with and without the patch. There must be something else specific to h8300 and the other broken architectures. Is there some other part of the configuration that could be hiding the issue in my arm64 build?