From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>
To: "Philipp Stanner" <pstanner@redhat.com>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
"Jonathan Cameron" <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Dave Jiang" <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
"Uladzislau Koshchanka" <koshchanka@gmail.com>,
"Neil Brown" <neilb@suse.de>,
"Niklas Schnelle" <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>,
"John Sanpe" <sanpeqf@gmail.com>,
"Kent Overstreet" <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>,
"Masami Hiramatsu" <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
"David Gow" <davidgow@google.com>,
"Yury Norov" <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
"wuqiang.matt" <wuqiang.matt@bytedance.com>,
"Jason Baron" <jbaron@akamai.com>,
"Kefeng Wang" <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
"Ben Dooks" <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>,
"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] lib, pci: unify generic pci_iounmap()
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2023 16:26:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <619ea619-29e4-42fb-9b27-1d1a32e0ee66@app.fastmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231201121622.16343-5-pstanner@redhat.com>
On Fri, Dec 1, 2023, at 13:16, Philipp Stanner wrote:
> The implementation of pci_iounmap() is currently scattered over two
> files, drivers/pci/iounmap.c and lib/iomap.c. Additionally,
> architectures can define their own version.
>
> Besides one unified version being desirable in the first place, the old
> version in drivers/pci/iounmap.c contained a bug and could leak memory
> mappings. The bug was that #ifdef ARCH_HAS_GENERIC_IOPORT_MAP should not
> have guarded iounmap(p); in addition to the preceding code.
>
> To have only one version, it's necessary to create a helper function,
> iomem_is_ioport(), that tells pci_iounmap() whether the passed address
> points to an ioport or normal memory.
>
> iomem_is_ioport() can be provided through three different ways:
> 1. The architecture itself provides it.
> 2. As a default version in include/asm-generic/io.h for those
> architectures that don't use CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP, but also don't
> provide their own version of iomem_is_ioport().
> 3. As a default version in lib/iomap.c for those architectures that
> define and use CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP (currently, only x86 really
> uses the functions in lib/iomap.c)
I would count 3 as a special case of 1 here.
> Create a unified version of pci_iounmap() in drivers/pci/iomap.c.
> Provide the function iomem_is_ioport() in include/asm-generic/io.h and
> lib/iomap.c.
>
> Remove the CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP guard around
> ARCH_WANTS_GENERIC_PCI_IOUNMAP so that configs that set
> CONFIG_GENERIC_PCI_IOMAP without CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP still get the
> function.
>
> Fixes: 316e8d79a095 ("pci_iounmap'2: Electric Boogaloo: try to make
> sense of it all")
> Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <pstanner@redhat.com>
Looks good overall. It would be nice to go further than this
and replace all the custom pci_iounmap() variants with custom
iomem_is_ioport() implementations, but that can be a follow-up
along with removing the incorrect or useless 'select GENERIC_IOMAP'
parts.
> return;
> - iounmap(p);
> + }
> #endif
> + iounmap(addr);
> }
I think the bugfix should be a separate patch so we can backport
it to stable kernels.
> +#ifndef CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP
> +static inline bool iomem_is_ioport(void __iomem *addr)
> +{
> + unsigned long port = (unsigned long __force)addr;
> +
> + // TODO: do we have to take IO_SPACE_LIMIT and PCI_IOBASE into account
> + // similar as in ioport_map() ?
> +
> + if (port > MMIO_UPPER_LIMIT)
> + return false;
> +
> + return true;
> +}
This has to have the exact logic that was present in the
old pci_iounmap(). For the default version that is currently
in lib/pci_iomap.c, this means something along the linens of
static inline bool struct iomem_is_ioport(void __iomem *p)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT
uintptr_t start = (uintptr_t) PCI_IOBASE;
uintptr_t addr = (uintptr_t) p;
if (addr >= start && addr < start + IO_SPACE_LIMIT)
return true;
#endif
return false;
}
> +#else /* CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP. Version from lib/iomap.c will be used.
> */
> +bool iomem_is_ioport(void __iomem *addr);
> +#define ARCH_WANTS_GENERIC_IOMEM_IS_IOPORT
I'm not sure what this macro is for, since it appears to
do the opposite of what its name suggests: rather than
provide the generic version of iomem_is_ioport(), it
skips that and provides a custom one to go with lib/iomap.c
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-01 15:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-01 12:16 [PATCH v2 0/4] Regather scattered PCI-Code Philipp Stanner
2023-12-01 12:16 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] lib: move pci_iomap.c to drivers/pci/ Philipp Stanner
2023-12-01 14:43 ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-12-01 18:56 ` Philipp Stanner
2023-12-01 22:17 ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-12-01 12:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] lib: move pci-specific devres code " Philipp Stanner
2023-12-01 14:44 ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-12-01 19:00 ` Philipp Stanner
2023-12-01 22:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-12-01 12:16 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] pci: move devres code from pci.c to devres.c Philipp Stanner
2023-12-01 12:16 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] lib, pci: unify generic pci_iounmap() Philipp Stanner
2023-12-01 15:26 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2023-12-01 19:37 ` Philipp Stanner
2023-12-01 21:32 ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-12-01 21:56 ` Philipp Stanner
2023-12-01 21:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-12-01 16:27 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] Regather scattered PCI-Code Arnd Bergmann
2023-12-01 19:09 ` Philipp Stanner
2023-12-01 22:17 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=619ea619-29e4-42fb-9b27-1d1a32e0ee66@app.fastmail.com \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@kernel.org \
--cc=ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=dakr@redhat.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=davidgow@google.com \
--cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kent.overstreet@gmail.com \
--cc=koshchanka@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=pstanner@redhat.com \
--cc=sanpeqf@gmail.com \
--cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=wuqiang.matt@bytedance.com \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox