linux-arch.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Andrew Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
	linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>,
	Guan Xuetao <gxt@pku.edu.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] x86: finish the MPX removal process
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 13:23:35 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <636d5f4b-c47f-77f6-067f-a6b342db5650@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200123202600.GG10328@zn.tnic>

On 1/23/20 12:26 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 11:26:38AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 11:23 AM Dave Hansen
>> <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>> I'd _rather_ this go in via the x86 tree, but I'm not picky.
> Any particular reason why?

I'm confident I can send patches to the x86 maintainers and not make
them too angry.  Sending pull requests to Linus, not so much. :)

I'll just plan to send it to Linus directly.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-01-23 21:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-23 19:04 [PATCH 0/5] x86: finish the MPX removal process Dave Hansen
2020-01-23 19:05 ` [PATCH 4/5] mm: remove arch_bprm_mm_init() hook Dave Hansen
2020-01-23 19:26 ` [PATCH 0/5] x86: finish the MPX removal process Linus Torvalds
2020-01-23 20:26   ` Borislav Petkov
2020-01-23 20:26     ` Borislav Petkov
2020-01-23 21:23     ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2020-01-23 21:23       ` Dave Hansen
2020-01-24  0:01       ` Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=636d5f4b-c47f-77f6-067f-a6b342db5650@intel.com \
    --to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gxt@pku.edu.cn \
    --cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).