public inbox for linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton
	<akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>,
	Linus Torvalds
	<torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>,
	Linux Arch Mailing List
	<linux-arch-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List
	<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	David Brownell
	<dbrownell-Rn4VEauK+AKRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add C99-style constructor macros for specific-sized integers
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 21:23:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6d00362802813d8ed477b58ab218d03c@kernel.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47CB826A.7000202-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>

>> Do these new macros really buy anything over just writing LL in the
>> few places that 64-bit constants are used?
>
> It gives you macros that matches the s64/u64 et al definitions are, 
> thus avoiding another class of spurious warnings.

GCC doesn't warn for implicit narrowing that doesn't change value.

The printk() example is a read herring IMHO, since variable arguments
functions are "very speshul" anyway, and require explicit casts in
many cases.


Segher

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Arch Mailing List <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add C99-style constructor macros for specific-sized integers
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 21:23:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6d00362802813d8ed477b58ab218d03c@kernel.crashing.org> (raw)
Message-ID: <20080303202334.hNbsueA6Kaadci0cKrAhLNZ-YSdkKuys-7m1LePewj0@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47CB826A.7000202@zytor.com>

>> Do these new macros really buy anything over just writing LL in the
>> few places that 64-bit constants are used?
>
> It gives you macros that matches the s64/u64 et al definitions are, 
> thus avoiding another class of spurious warnings.

GCC doesn't warn for implicit narrowing that doesn't change value.

The printk() example is a read herring IMHO, since variable arguments
functions are "very speshul" anyway, and require explicit casts in
many cases.


Segher


  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-03-03 20:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-03  0:09 [PATCH 1/2] Add C99-style constructor macros for specific-sized integers H. Peter Anvin
2008-03-03  0:09 ` H. Peter Anvin
     [not found] ` <4a8566f54ff84f498c5c0c0340076c296b1840e6-TYXNXmPMDn57u0wkx6qpVYSLwOllVvif@public.gmane.org>
2008-03-03  0:09   ` [PATCH 2/2] Use U64_C() instead of casts in kernel/time.c H. Peter Anvin
2008-03-03  0:09     ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-03-03  2:38   ` [PATCH 1/2] Add C99-style constructor macros for specific-sized integers Matthew Wilcox
2008-03-03  2:38     ` Matthew Wilcox
     [not found]     ` <20080303023851.GF24386-6jwH94ZQLHl74goWV3ctuw@public.gmane.org>
2008-03-03  4:43       ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-03-03  4:43         ` H. Peter Anvin
     [not found]         ` <47CB81EA.8070802-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2008-03-03  6:20           ` Al Viro
     [not found]             ` <20080303062007.GY27894-3bDd1+5oDREiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>
2008-03-03  6:12               ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-03-03  6:12                 ` H. Peter Anvin
     [not found]                 ` <47CB96D5.3030509-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2008-03-03  6:32                   ` Al Viro
     [not found]                     ` <20080303063216.GA27894-3bDd1+5oDREiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>
2008-03-03  6:28                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-03-03  6:28                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-03-03  6:32                     ` Al Viro
2008-03-03  6:20             ` Al Viro
2008-03-03  3:20   ` Segher Boessenkool
2008-03-03  3:20     ` Segher Boessenkool
2008-03-03  4:14     ` David Brownell
2008-03-03  4:14       ` David Brownell
     [not found]       ` <200803022014.11535.david-b-yBeKhBN/0LDR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
2008-03-03  4:50         ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-03-03  4:50           ` H. Peter Anvin
     [not found]     ` <7e0381d9932a37ad78f0c38b2a3c6a03-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
2008-03-03  4:45       ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-03-03  4:45         ` H. Peter Anvin
     [not found]         ` <47CB826A.7000202-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2008-03-03 20:23           ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]
2008-03-03 20:23             ` Segher Boessenkool
2008-03-03 10:57   ` David Howells
2008-03-03 10:57     ` David Howells
     [not found]     ` <8260.1204541852-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2008-03-03 11:43       ` Russell King
2008-03-03 11:43         ` Russell King
     [not found]     ` <20080303114310.GA28139-f404yB8NqCZvn6HldHNs0ANdhmdF6hFW@public.gmane.org>
2008-03-03 12:15       ` David Howells
2008-03-03 12:15         ` David Howells
2008-03-03 12:40       ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-03-03 12:40         ` Sam Ravnborg
     [not found]         ` <20080303124050.GA24841-QabhHTsIXMSnlFQ6Q1D1Y0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
2008-03-03 17:03           ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-03-03 17:03             ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6d00362802813d8ed477b58ab218d03c@kernel.crashing.org \
    --to=segher-xvmvhmargas8u2djnn8i7kb+6bgklq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=dbrownell-Rn4VEauK+AKRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-arch-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox