From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:58290 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2992462AbXDLKs0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Apr 2007 06:48:26 -0400 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <1176334892.14322.137.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1176334892.14322.137.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20070410194834.b688ce55.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <200704062127.l36LRMA7019394@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> <6632.1176200270@redhat.com> <1176257950.26372.50.camel@localhost.localdomain> <14926.1176288559@redhat.com> <20070411112452.6979414c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Subject: Re: + expose-range-checking-functions-from-arch-specific.patch added to -mm tree Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 11:47:47 +0100 Message-ID: <720.1176374867@redhat.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Rusty Russell Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, randy.dunlap@oracle.com List-ID: Rusty Russell wrote: > +static inline bool range_over_limit(unsigned long start, unsigned long len, > + unsigned long limit) I like it. > + * range_over_limit() - is a start and length past a limit? As I understand it you wouldn't normally put "()" there for kdoc comments. David