From: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Raj Ashok <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>,
"Gayatri Kammela" <gayatri.kammela@intel.com>,
Zeng Guang <guang.zeng@intel.com>,
"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Randy E Witt <randy.e.witt@intel.com>,
"Shankar, Ravi V" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
Ramesh Thomas <ramesh.thomas@intel.com>,
Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/13] x86 User Interrupts support
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 10:24:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <778d40fe-ad8e-fd7c-4caa-499910bb0925@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YVXmGTo5Uzp44QQq@stefanha-x1.localdomain>
On 9/30/2021 9:30 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 09:31:34PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>> I spent some time reviewing the docs (ISE) and contemplating how this all fits together, and I have a high level question:
>>
>> Can someone give an example of a realistic workload that would benefit from SENDUIPI and precisely how it would use SENDUIPI? Or an example of a realistic workload that would benefit from hypothetical device-initiated user interrupts and how it would use them? I'm having trouble imagining something that wouldn't work as well or better by simply polling, at least on DMA-coherent architectures like x86.
> I was wondering the same thing. One thing came to mind:
>
> An application that wants to be *interrupted* from what it's doing
> rather than waiting until the next polling point. For example,
> applications that are CPU-intensive and have green threads. I can't name
> a real application like this though :P.
Thank you Stefan and Andy for giving this some thought.
We are consolidating the information internally on where and how exactly
we expect to see benefits with real workloads for the various sources of
User Interrupts. It will take a few days to get back on this one.
> (I can imagine some benefit to a hypothetical improved SENDUIPI with idential user semantics but that supported a proper interaction with the scheduler and blocking syscalls. But that's not what's documented in the ISE...)
Andy, can you please provide some more context/details on this? Is this
regarding the blocking syscalls discussion (in patch 11) or something else?
Thanks,
Sohil
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-30 17:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 87+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-13 20:01 [RFC PATCH 00/13] x86 User Interrupts support Sohil Mehta
2021-09-13 20:01 ` [RFC PATCH 01/13] x86/uintr/man-page: Include man pages draft for reference Sohil Mehta
2021-09-13 20:01 ` [RFC PATCH 02/13] Documentation/x86: Add documentation for User Interrupts Sohil Mehta
2021-09-13 20:01 ` [RFC PATCH 03/13] x86/cpu: Enumerate User Interrupts support Sohil Mehta
2021-09-23 22:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-09-24 19:59 ` Sohil Mehta
2021-09-27 20:42 ` Sohil Mehta
2021-09-13 20:01 ` [RFC PATCH 04/13] x86/fpu/xstate: Enumerate User Interrupts supervisor state Sohil Mehta
2021-09-23 22:34 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-09-27 22:25 ` Sohil Mehta
2021-09-13 20:01 ` [RFC PATCH 05/13] x86/irq: Reserve a user IPI notification vector Sohil Mehta
2021-09-23 23:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-09-25 13:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-09-26 12:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-09-27 19:07 ` Sohil Mehta
2021-09-28 8:11 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-09-27 19:26 ` Sohil Mehta
2021-09-13 20:01 ` [RFC PATCH 06/13] x86/uintr: Introduce uintr receiver syscalls Sohil Mehta
2021-09-23 12:26 ` Greg KH
2021-09-24 0:05 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-09-27 23:20 ` Sohil Mehta
2021-09-28 4:39 ` Greg KH
2021-09-28 16:47 ` Sohil Mehta
2021-09-23 23:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-09-27 23:57 ` Sohil Mehta
2021-09-13 20:01 ` [RFC PATCH 07/13] x86/process/64: Add uintr task context switch support Sohil Mehta
2021-09-24 0:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-09-28 0:30 ` Sohil Mehta
2021-09-13 20:01 ` [RFC PATCH 08/13] x86/process/64: Clean up uintr task fork and exit paths Sohil Mehta
2021-09-24 1:02 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-09-28 1:23 ` Sohil Mehta
2021-09-13 20:01 ` [RFC PATCH 09/13] x86/uintr: Introduce vector registration and uintr_fd syscall Sohil Mehta
2021-09-24 10:33 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-09-28 20:40 ` Sohil Mehta
2021-09-13 20:01 ` [RFC PATCH 10/13] x86/uintr: Introduce user IPI sender syscalls Sohil Mehta
2021-09-23 12:28 ` Greg KH
2021-09-28 18:01 ` Sohil Mehta
2021-09-29 7:04 ` Greg KH
2021-09-29 14:27 ` Sohil Mehta
2021-09-24 10:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-09-13 20:01 ` [RFC PATCH 11/13] x86/uintr: Introduce uintr_wait() syscall Sohil Mehta
2021-09-24 11:04 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-09-25 12:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-09-28 23:13 ` Sohil Mehta
2021-09-28 23:08 ` Sohil Mehta
2021-09-26 14:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-09-29 1:09 ` Sohil Mehta
2021-09-29 3:30 ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-09-29 4:56 ` Sohil Mehta
2021-09-30 18:08 ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-09-30 19:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-09-30 22:01 ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-10-01 0:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-10-01 4:41 ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-10-01 9:56 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-10-01 15:13 ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-10-01 18:04 ` Sohil Mehta
2021-10-01 21:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-10-01 23:00 ` Sohil Mehta
2021-10-01 23:04 ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-09-13 20:01 ` [RFC PATCH 12/13] x86/uintr: Wire up the user interrupt syscalls Sohil Mehta
2021-09-13 20:01 ` [RFC PATCH 13/13] selftests/x86: Add basic tests for User IPI Sohil Mehta
2021-09-13 20:27 ` [RFC PATCH 00/13] x86 User Interrupts support Dave Hansen
2021-09-14 19:03 ` Mehta, Sohil
2021-09-23 12:19 ` Greg KH
2021-09-23 14:09 ` Greg KH
2021-09-23 14:46 ` Dave Hansen
2021-09-23 15:07 ` Greg KH
2021-09-23 23:24 ` Sohil Mehta
2021-09-23 23:09 ` Sohil Mehta
2021-09-24 0:17 ` Sohil Mehta
2021-09-23 14:39 ` Jens Axboe
2021-09-29 4:31 ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-09-30 16:30 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-09-30 17:24 ` Sohil Mehta [this message]
2021-09-30 17:26 ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-10-01 16:35 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-10-01 16:41 ` Richard Henderson
2021-09-30 16:26 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-10-01 0:40 ` Sohil Mehta
2021-10-01 8:19 ` Pavel Machek
2021-11-18 22:19 ` Sohil Mehta
2021-11-16 3:49 ` Prakash Sangappa
2021-11-18 21:44 ` Sohil Mehta
2021-12-22 16:17 ` Chrisma Pakha
2022-01-07 2:08 ` Sohil Mehta
2022-01-17 1:14 ` Chrisma Pakha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=778d40fe-ad8e-fd7c-4caa-499910bb0925@intel.com \
--to=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=christian@brauner.io \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=gayatri.kammela@intel.com \
--cc=guang.zeng@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ramesh.thomas@intel.com \
--cc=randy.e.witt@intel.com \
--cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).