* Re: [GIT PULL] Disintegrate UAPI for m68k
[not found] <17383.1349380286@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
@ 2012-10-05 5:05 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-10-05 12:50 ` David Howells
1 sibling, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2012-10-05 5:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Howells; +Cc: linux-m68k, linux-kernel, Linux-Arch
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 9:51 PM, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> wrote:
> git://git.infradead.org/users/dhowells/linux-headers.git disintegrate-m68k
>
> for you to fetch changes up to b039235da939b28c539b3e1b4566107a9bdbdef8:
>
> UAPI: (Scripted) Disintegrate arch/m68k/include/asm (2012-10-04 18:20:56 +0100)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> David Howells (6):
> UAPI: Fix the guards on various asm/unistd.h files
> UAPI: Split compound conditionals containing __KERNEL__ in Arm64
> Merge remote-tracking branch 'c6x/for-linux-next' into uapi-prep
> UAPI: Fix conditional header installation handling (notably kvm_para.h on m68k)
> UAPI: (Scripted) Disintegrate include/asm-generic
> UAPI: (Scripted) Disintegrate arch/m68k/include/asm
>
> Mark Salter (2):
> c6x: make dsk6455 the default config
> c6x: remove c6x signal.h
I assume these c6x and asm-generic changes are the ones you just asked Linus
to pull? Doesn't it make more sense to ask us (the individual arch maintainers)
to pull our parts after Linus has pulled the generic part?
Do you want this ("our parts") to go in 3.7 or 3.8?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [GIT PULL] Disintegrate UAPI for m68k
[not found] <17383.1349380286@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
2012-10-05 5:05 ` [GIT PULL] Disintegrate UAPI for m68k Geert Uytterhoeven
@ 2012-10-05 12:50 ` David Howells
1 sibling, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Howells @ 2012-10-05 12:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Geert Uytterhoeven; +Cc: dhowells, linux-m68k, linux-kernel, Linux-Arch
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> I assume these c6x and asm-generic changes are the ones you just asked Linus
> to pull?
Yes.
> Doesn't it make more sense to ask us (the individual arch maintainers) to
> pull our parts after Linus has pulled the generic part?
I suppose so.
> Do you want this ("our parts") to go in 3.7 or 3.8?
3.7 would be nice, but I know not everyone is willing to pull in this merge
window. It might also make sense to wait for (a) Linus to pull those and (b)
Arnd to pass the asm-generic changes along too.
The main reason I'd like to get things moved along asap is that the
preparatory patches get things into a known state upon which these commits can
be pulled. However, the state is going to degrade over time as people make
changes which requires more preparatory patches:-/
David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-10-05 12:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <17383.1349380286@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
2012-10-05 5:05 ` [GIT PULL] Disintegrate UAPI for m68k Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-10-05 12:50 ` David Howells
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).