Generic Linux architectural discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Waiman Long <llong@redhat.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>,
	Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>,
	linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>,
	linux-um@lists.infradead.org,
	Julian Braha <julianbraha@gmail.com>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] LOCKDEP: reduce LOCKDEP dependency list
Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 10:17:57 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7e4cc7da-c185-a35f-9047-615ffb222640@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210524224150.8009-1-rdunlap@infradead.org>

On 5/24/21 6:41 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Some arches (um, sparc64, riscv, xtensa) cause a Kconfig warning for
> LOCKDEP.
> These arch-es select LOCKDEP_SUPPORT but they are not listed as one
> of the arch-es that LOCKDEP depends on.
>
> Since (16) arch-es define the Kconfig symbol LOCKDEP_SUPPORT if they
> intend to have LOCKDEP support, replace the awkward list of
> arch-es that LOCKDEP depends on with the LOCKDEP_SUPPORT symbol.
>
> But wait. LOCKDEP_SUPPORT is included in LOCK_DEBUGGING_SUPPORT,
> which is already a dependency here, so LOCKDEP_SUPPORT is redundant
> and not needed.
> That leaves the FRAME_POINTER dependency, but it is part of an
> expression like this:
> 	depends on (A && B) && (FRAME_POINTER || B')
> where B' is a dependency of B so if B is true then B' is true
> and the value of FRAME_POINTER does not matter.
> Thus we can also delete the FRAME_POINTER dependency.
>
> Fixes this kconfig warning: (for um, sparc64, riscv, xtensa)
>
> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for LOCKDEP
>    Depends on [n]: DEBUG_KERNEL [=y] && LOCK_DEBUGGING_SUPPORT [=y] && (FRAME_POINTER [=n] || MIPS || PPC || S390 || MICROBLAZE || ARM || ARC || X86)
>    Selected by [y]:
>    - PROVE_LOCKING [=y] && DEBUG_KERNEL [=y] && LOCK_DEBUGGING_SUPPORT [=y]
>    - LOCK_STAT [=y] && DEBUG_KERNEL [=y] && LOCK_DEBUGGING_SUPPORT [=y]
>    - DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC [=y] && DEBUG_KERNEL [=y] && LOCK_DEBUGGING_SUPPORT [=y]
>
> Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210517034430.9569-1-rdunlap@infradead.org/
>
> Fixes: 7d37cb2c912d ("lib: fix kconfig dependency on ARCH_WANT_FRAME_POINTERS")
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
> Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
> Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>
> Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
> Cc: linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org
> Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
> Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
> Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
> Cc: Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>
> Cc: linux-um@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: Julian Braha <julianbraha@gmail.com>
> Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> @Julian: please take a look. I'm a little concerned about the
>    FRAME_POINTER dependency going away when our 2 patches are combined.
>
> v2: drop depends on LOCKDEP_SUPPORT for LOCKDEP; the use of
>      LOCK_DEBUGGING_SUPPORT already covers that dependency;
>      drop FRAME_POINTER dependency (thanks to Waiman Long
>      for both of these suggestions)
> v2: add CC: to linux-arch
>
>   lib/Kconfig.debug |    1 -
>   1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- linux-next-20210524.orig/lib/Kconfig.debug
> +++ linux-next-20210524/lib/Kconfig.debug
> @@ -1383,7 +1383,6 @@ config LOCKDEP
>   	bool
>   	depends on DEBUG_KERNEL && LOCK_DEBUGGING_SUPPORT
>   	select STACKTRACE
> -	depends on FRAME_POINTER || MIPS || PPC || S390 || MICROBLAZE || ARM || ARC || X86
>   	select KALLSYMS
>   	select KALLSYMS_ALL
>   
>
Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>

Cheers,
Longman


      parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-25 14:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-24 22:41 [PATCH v2] LOCKDEP: reduce LOCKDEP dependency list Randy Dunlap
2021-05-25  3:31 ` Julian Braha
2021-05-25  7:08   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-05-25  7:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-05-25 14:17 ` Waiman Long [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7e4cc7da-c185-a35f-9047-615ffb222640@redhat.com \
    --to=llong@redhat.com \
    --cc=anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=chris@zankel.net \
    --cc=jcmvbkbc@gmail.com \
    --cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=julianbraha@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-um@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox