From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Howells Subject: Re: [RFC patch 08/18] cnt32_to_63 should use smp_rmb() Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2008 16:55:59 +0000 Message-ID: <8445.1226076959@redhat.com> References: <20081107003816.9b0f947a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20081107052336.652868737@polymtl.ca> <20081107053349.861709786@polymtl.ca> <20081106220530.5b0e3a96.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <25363.1226056819@redhat.com> <20081107075003.fa93ccf4.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:57363 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752595AbYKGQ4t (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Nov 2008 11:56:49 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Andrew Morton , Mathieu Desnoyers , Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ralf Baechle , benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, David Miller , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Steven Rostedt , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > Well I'm glad it wasn't designed to demonstrate tastefulness. > > Fast tricks aren't always meant to be beautiful. That,s why we have > abstraction layers. And comments. The comment attached to cnt32_to_63() is well written and informative. > I know nothing about mn10300. That's aimed my way. David