From: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
To: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>,
Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 23/28] arm64/sve: KVM: Treat guest SVE use as undefined instruction execution
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 15:43:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bmltd0pv.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170929130029.GG3611@e103592.cambridge.arm.com>
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com> writes:
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 02:31:13PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>
>> Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com> writes:
>>
>> > When trapping forbidden attempts by a guest to use SVE, we want the
>> > guest to see a trap consistent with SVE not being implemented.
>> >
>> > This patch injects an undefined instruction exception into the
>> > guest in response to such an exception.
>>
>> I do wonder if this should be merged with the previous trap enabling
>> patch though?
>
> Yes, that would make sense now I look at it.
>
> Can I keep your Reviewed-by on the combined patch?
Sure.
>
> Cheers
> ---Dave
>
>>
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
>> > ---
>> > arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c | 8 ++++++++
>> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
>> > index 17d8a16..e3e42d0 100644
>> > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
>> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
>> > @@ -147,6 +147,13 @@ static int kvm_handle_unknown_ec(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>> > return 1;
>> > }
>> >
>> > +static int handle_sve(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>> > +{
>> > + /* Until SVE is supported for guests: */
>> > + kvm_inject_undefined(vcpu);
>> > + return 1;
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > static exit_handle_fn arm_exit_handlers[] = {
>> > [0 ... ESR_ELx_EC_MAX] = kvm_handle_unknown_ec,
>> > [ESR_ELx_EC_WFx] = kvm_handle_wfx,
>> > @@ -160,6 +167,7 @@ static exit_handle_fn arm_exit_handlers[] = {
>> > [ESR_ELx_EC_HVC64] = handle_hvc,
>> > [ESR_ELx_EC_SMC64] = handle_smc,
>> > [ESR_ELx_EC_SYS64] = kvm_handle_sys_reg,
>> > + [ESR_ELx_EC_SVE] = handle_sve,
>> > [ESR_ELx_EC_IABT_LOW] = kvm_handle_guest_abort,
>> > [ESR_ELx_EC_DABT_LOW] = kvm_handle_guest_abort,
>> > [ESR_ELx_EC_SOFTSTP_LOW]= kvm_handle_guest_debug,
>>
>>
>> --
>> Alex Bennée
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
To: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>,
Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 23/28] arm64/sve: KVM: Treat guest SVE use as undefined instruction execution
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 15:43:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bmltd0pv.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
Message-ID: <20170929144340.hgt5gANHIyuNIebFPPZFvZXjT_CjWBAHYMAbC98_3xw@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170929130029.GG3611@e103592.cambridge.arm.com>
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com> writes:
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 02:31:13PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>
>> Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com> writes:
>>
>> > When trapping forbidden attempts by a guest to use SVE, we want the
>> > guest to see a trap consistent with SVE not being implemented.
>> >
>> > This patch injects an undefined instruction exception into the
>> > guest in response to such an exception.
>>
>> I do wonder if this should be merged with the previous trap enabling
>> patch though?
>
> Yes, that would make sense now I look at it.
>
> Can I keep your Reviewed-by on the combined patch?
Sure.
>
> Cheers
> ---Dave
>
>>
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
>> > ---
>> > arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c | 8 ++++++++
>> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
>> > index 17d8a16..e3e42d0 100644
>> > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
>> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
>> > @@ -147,6 +147,13 @@ static int kvm_handle_unknown_ec(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>> > return 1;
>> > }
>> >
>> > +static int handle_sve(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>> > +{
>> > + /* Until SVE is supported for guests: */
>> > + kvm_inject_undefined(vcpu);
>> > + return 1;
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > static exit_handle_fn arm_exit_handlers[] = {
>> > [0 ... ESR_ELx_EC_MAX] = kvm_handle_unknown_ec,
>> > [ESR_ELx_EC_WFx] = kvm_handle_wfx,
>> > @@ -160,6 +167,7 @@ static exit_handle_fn arm_exit_handlers[] = {
>> > [ESR_ELx_EC_HVC64] = handle_hvc,
>> > [ESR_ELx_EC_SMC64] = handle_smc,
>> > [ESR_ELx_EC_SYS64] = kvm_handle_sys_reg,
>> > + [ESR_ELx_EC_SVE] = handle_sve,
>> > [ESR_ELx_EC_IABT_LOW] = kvm_handle_guest_abort,
>> > [ESR_ELx_EC_DABT_LOW] = kvm_handle_guest_abort,
>> > [ESR_ELx_EC_SOFTSTP_LOW]= kvm_handle_guest_debug,
>>
>>
>> --
>> Alex Bennée
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
--
Alex Bennée
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-29 14:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 128+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-31 17:00 [PATCH v2 00/28] ARM Scalable Vector Extension (SVE) Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 01/28] regset: Add support for dynamically sized regsets Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 02/28] arm64: KVM: Hide unsupported AArch64 CPU features from guests Dave Martin
2017-09-13 14:37 ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-13 14:37 ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-15 0:04 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 03/28] arm64: efi: Add missing Kconfig dependency on KERNEL_MODE_NEON Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 04/28] arm64: Port deprecated instruction emulation to new sysctl interface Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 05/28] arm64: fpsimd: Simplify uses of {set,clear}_ti_thread_flag() Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 06/28] arm64/sve: System register and exception syndrome definitions Dave Martin
2017-09-13 14:48 ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-13 14:48 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 07/28] arm64/sve: Low-level SVE architectural state manipulation functions Dave Martin
2017-09-13 15:39 ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-13 15:39 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 08/28] arm64/sve: Kconfig update and conditional compilation support Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 09/28] arm64/sve: Signal frame and context structure definition Dave Martin
2017-09-13 13:36 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-09-13 21:33 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 10/28] arm64/sve: Low-level CPU setup Dave Martin
2017-09-13 13:32 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-09-13 19:21 ` Dave Martin
2017-09-13 19:21 ` Dave Martin
2017-10-05 10:47 ` Dave Martin
2017-10-05 11:04 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2017-10-05 11:22 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 11/28] arm64/sve: Core task context handling Dave Martin
2017-09-13 14:33 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-09-14 19:55 ` Dave Martin
2017-09-20 13:58 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-10-03 11:11 ` Dave Martin
2017-10-03 11:11 ` Dave Martin
2017-10-04 17:29 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-10-03 11:33 ` Dave Martin
2017-10-05 11:28 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-10-06 13:10 ` Dave Martin
2017-10-06 13:36 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-10-06 15:15 ` Dave Martin
2017-10-06 15:15 ` Dave Martin
2017-10-06 15:33 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-09-13 17:26 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-09-13 19:17 ` Dave Martin
2017-09-13 22:21 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-09-14 19:40 ` Dave Martin
2017-09-19 17:13 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 12/28] arm64/sve: Support vector length resetting for new processes Dave Martin
2017-09-14 8:47 ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-14 8:47 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 13/28] arm64/sve: Signal handling support Dave Martin
2017-09-14 9:30 ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-14 9:30 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 14/28] arm64/sve: Backend logic for setting the vector length Dave Martin
2017-09-13 17:29 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-09-13 19:06 ` Dave Martin
2017-09-13 22:11 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-10-05 16:42 ` Dave Martin
2017-10-05 16:53 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-10-05 17:04 ` Dave Martin
2017-09-20 10:57 ` Alan Hayward
2017-09-20 10:59 ` Alan Hayward
2017-09-20 11:09 ` Dave Martin
2017-09-20 18:08 ` Alan Hayward
2017-09-21 11:19 ` Dave Martin
2017-09-21 11:57 ` Alan Hayward
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 15/28] arm64: cpufeature: Move sys_caps_initialised declarations Dave Martin
2017-09-14 9:33 ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-14 9:33 ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-14 9:35 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 16/28] arm64/sve: Probe SVE capabilities and usable vector lengths Dave Martin
2017-09-14 9:45 ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-14 9:45 ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-28 14:22 ` Dave Martin
2017-09-28 17:32 ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-28 17:32 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 17/28] arm64/sve: Preserve SVE registers around kernel-mode NEON use Dave Martin
2017-09-14 10:52 ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-14 10:52 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 18/28] arm64/sve: Preserve SVE registers around EFI runtime service calls Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00 ` Dave Martin
2017-09-14 11:01 ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-14 11:01 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 19/28] arm64/sve: ptrace and ELF coredump support Dave Martin
2017-09-06 16:21 ` Okamoto, Takayuki
2017-09-06 16:21 ` Okamoto, Takayuki
2017-09-06 18:16 ` Dave Martin
2017-09-07 5:11 ` Okamoto, Takayuki
2017-09-07 5:11 ` Okamoto, Takayuki
2017-09-08 13:11 ` Dave Martin
2017-09-14 12:57 ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-14 12:57 ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-28 14:57 ` Dave Martin
2017-09-29 12:46 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 20/28] arm64/sve: Add prctl controls for userspace vector length management Dave Martin
2017-09-14 13:02 ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-14 13:02 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 21/28] arm64/sve: Add sysctl to set the default vector length for new processes Dave Martin
2017-09-14 13:05 ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-14 13:05 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 22/28] arm64/sve: KVM: Prevent guests from using SVE Dave Martin
2017-09-14 13:28 ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-14 13:28 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 23/28] arm64/sve: KVM: Treat guest SVE use as undefined instruction execution Dave Martin
2017-09-14 13:30 ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-14 13:30 ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-14 13:31 ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-14 13:31 ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-29 13:00 ` Dave Martin
2017-09-29 14:43 ` Alex Bennée [this message]
2017-09-29 14:43 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 24/28] arm64/sve: KVM: Hide SVE from CPU features exposed to guests Dave Martin
2017-09-14 13:32 ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-14 13:32 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 25/28] arm64/sve: Detect SVE and activate runtime support Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 26/28] arm64/sve: Add documentation Dave Martin
2017-10-05 16:39 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2017-10-05 17:02 ` Dave Martin
2017-10-06 15:43 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2017-10-06 17:37 ` Dave Martin
2017-10-09 9:34 ` Alex Bennée
2017-10-09 9:34 ` Alex Bennée
2017-10-09 9:49 ` Dave Martin
2017-10-09 14:07 ` Alex Bennée
2017-10-09 14:07 ` Alex Bennée
2017-10-09 16:20 ` Dave Martin
2017-10-09 16:20 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 27/28] arm64: signal: Report signal frame size to userspace via auxv Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:01 ` [RFC PATCH v2 28/28] arm64/sve: signal: Include SVE when computing AT_MINSIGSTKSZ Dave Martin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87bmltd0pv.fsf@linaro.org \
--to=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
--cc=szabolcs.nagy@arm.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).