From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rusty Russell Subject: Re: [RFC/PULL 00/11] introduce export.h; reduce module.h usage Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:37:47 +1030 Message-ID: <87botlej9o.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> References: <1311830178-30314-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:41491 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752068Ab1JMCJJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Oct 2011 22:09:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1311830178-30314-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Paul Gortmaker , mingo@elte.hu, torvalds@linux-foundation.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 01:16:07 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > I don't think there really is any rocket science or contentious stuff here. > It is a sensible cleanup that adds organization and speeds up compiles. > The RFC I'm hoping for is more about how/when we want to get this in tree. In future, when you're ripping into module.h, please CC the module maintainer. It's not just a courtesy, it helps everyone avoid redundant work. You may insert your own sarcastic comment about "rocket science" here. As to the patch: it's marginal improvement, but it's neater and I'm happy you're doing it. Thanks, Rusty.