From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@sifive.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Timothy Pearson <tpearson@raptorengineering.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@sifive.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 10/12] drm/amd/display: Use ARCH_HAS_KERNEL_FPU_SUPPORT
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2023 23:23:35 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h6kpdj20.fsf@mail.lhotse> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231208055501.2916202-11-samuel.holland@sifive.com>
Hi Samuel,
Thanks for trying to clean all this up.
One problem below.
Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@sifive.com> writes:
> Now that all previously-supported architectures select
> ARCH_HAS_KERNEL_FPU_SUPPORT, this code can depend on that symbol instead
> of the existing list of architectures. It can also take advantage of the
> common kernel-mode FPU API and method of adjusting CFLAGS.
>
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@sifive.com>
...
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/dc_fpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/dc_fpu.c
> index 4ae4720535a5..b64f917174ca 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/dc_fpu.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/dc_fpu.c
> @@ -87,20 +78,9 @@ void dc_fpu_begin(const char *function_name, const int line)
> WARN_ON_ONCE(!in_task());
> preempt_disable();
> depth = __this_cpu_inc_return(fpu_recursion_depth);
> -
> if (depth == 1) {
> -#if defined(CONFIG_X86) || defined(CONFIG_LOONGARCH)
> + BUG_ON(!kernel_fpu_available());
> kernel_fpu_begin();
> -#elif defined(CONFIG_PPC64)
> - if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_VSX_COMP))
> - enable_kernel_vsx();
> - else if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ALTIVEC_COMP))
> - enable_kernel_altivec();
Note altivec.
> - else if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_FPU_UNAVAILABLE))
> - enable_kernel_fp();
> -#elif defined(CONFIG_ARM64)
> - kernel_neon_begin();
> -#endif
> }
>
> TRACE_DCN_FPU(true, function_name, line, depth);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/Makefile
> index ea7d60f9a9b4..5aad0f572ba3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/Makefile
> @@ -25,40 +25,8 @@
> # It provides the general basic services required by other DAL
> # subcomponents.
>
> -ifdef CONFIG_X86
> -dml_ccflags-$(CONFIG_CC_IS_GCC) := -mhard-float
> -dml_ccflags := $(dml_ccflags-y) -msse
> -endif
> -
> -ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
> -dml_ccflags := -mhard-float -maltivec
> -endif
And altivec is enabled in the flags there.
That doesn't match your implementation for powerpc in patch 7, which
only deals with float.
I suspect the AMD driver actually doesn't need altivec enabled, but I
don't know that for sure. It compiles without it, but I don't have a GPU
to actually test. I've added Timothy on Cc who added the support for
powerpc to the driver originally, hopefully he has a test system.
Anyway if that's true that it doesn't need altivec we should probably do
a lead-up patch that drops altivec from the AMD driver explicitly, eg.
as below.
cheers
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/dc_fpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/dc_fpu.c
index 4ae4720535a5..0de16796466b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/dc_fpu.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/dc_fpu.c
@@ -92,11 +92,7 @@ void dc_fpu_begin(const char *function_name, const int line)
#if defined(CONFIG_X86) || defined(CONFIG_LOONGARCH)
kernel_fpu_begin();
#elif defined(CONFIG_PPC64)
- if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_VSX_COMP))
- enable_kernel_vsx();
- else if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ALTIVEC_COMP))
- enable_kernel_altivec();
- else if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_FPU_UNAVAILABLE))
+ if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_FPU_UNAVAILABLE))
enable_kernel_fp();
#elif defined(CONFIG_ARM64)
kernel_neon_begin();
@@ -125,11 +121,7 @@ void dc_fpu_end(const char *function_name, const int line)
#if defined(CONFIG_X86) || defined(CONFIG_LOONGARCH)
kernel_fpu_end();
#elif defined(CONFIG_PPC64)
- if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_VSX_COMP))
- disable_kernel_vsx();
- else if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ALTIVEC_COMP))
- disable_kernel_altivec();
- else if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_FPU_UNAVAILABLE))
+ if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_FPU_UNAVAILABLE))
disable_kernel_fp();
#elif defined(CONFIG_ARM64)
kernel_neon_end();
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/Makefile
index 6042a5a6a44f..554c39024a40 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/Makefile
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ dml_ccflags := $(dml_ccflags-y) -msse
endif
ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
-dml_ccflags := -mhard-float -maltivec
+dml_ccflags := -mhard-float
endif
ifdef CONFIG_ARM64
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml2/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml2/Makefile
index acff3449b8d7..7b51364084b5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml2/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml2/Makefile
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ dml2_ccflags := $(dml2_ccflags-y) -msse
endif
ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
-dml2_ccflags := -mhard-float -maltivec
+dml2_ccflags := -mhard-float
endif
ifdef CONFIG_ARM64
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-11 12:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-08 5:54 [RFC PATCH 00/12] Unified cross-architecture kernel-mode FPU API Samuel Holland
2023-12-08 5:54 ` [RFC PATCH 01/12] arch: Add ARCH_HAS_KERNEL_FPU_SUPPORT Samuel Holland
2023-12-11 16:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-08 5:54 ` [RFC PATCH 02/12] ARM: Implement ARCH_HAS_KERNEL_FPU_SUPPORT Samuel Holland
2023-12-11 16:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-08 5:54 ` [RFC PATCH 03/12] ARM: crypto: Use CC_FLAGS_FPU for NEON CFLAGS Samuel Holland
2023-12-11 16:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-08 5:54 ` [RFC PATCH 04/12] arm64: Implement ARCH_HAS_KERNEL_FPU_SUPPORT Samuel Holland
2023-12-11 16:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-13 16:19 ` Will Deacon
2023-12-08 5:54 ` [RFC PATCH 05/12] lib/raid6: Use CC_FLAGS_FPU for NEON CFLAGS Samuel Holland
2023-12-11 16:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-11 16:12 ` Samuel Holland
2023-12-12 7:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-08 5:54 ` [RFC PATCH 06/12] LoongArch: Implement ARCH_HAS_KERNEL_FPU_SUPPORT Samuel Holland
2023-12-11 16:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-13 16:13 ` WANG Xuerui
2023-12-08 5:54 ` [RFC PATCH 07/12] powerpc: " Samuel Holland
2023-12-11 16:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-08 5:54 ` [RFC PATCH 08/12] x86: " Samuel Holland
2023-12-11 16:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-08 5:54 ` [RFC PATCH 09/12] riscv: Add support for kernel-mode FPU Samuel Holland
2023-12-11 16:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-11 16:16 ` Samuel Holland
2023-12-08 5:54 ` [RFC PATCH 10/12] drm/amd/display: Use ARCH_HAS_KERNEL_FPU_SUPPORT Samuel Holland
2023-12-11 12:23 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2023-12-14 1:03 ` Samuel Holland
2023-12-14 3:13 ` Timothy Pearson
2023-12-14 4:45 ` Michael Ellerman
2023-12-08 5:54 ` [RFC PATCH 11/12] selftests/fpu: Move FP code to a separate translation unit Samuel Holland
2023-12-11 16:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-08 5:54 ` [RFC PATCH 12/12] selftests/fpu: Allow building on other architectures Samuel Holland
2023-12-11 16:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87h6kpdj20.fsf@mail.lhotse \
--to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=samuel.holland@sifive.com \
--cc=tpearson@raptorengineering.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).