From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/28] mm: preemptibility -v3 Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 18:36:08 +0200 Message-ID: <87hble6brb.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> References: <20100607110654.606530953@chello.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:35636 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751324Ab0FGQgM (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jun 2010 12:36:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100607110654.606530953@chello.nl> (Peter Zijlstra's message of "Mon\, 07 Jun 2010 13\:06\:54 +0200") Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Andrea Arcangeli , Avi Kivity , Thomas Gleixner , Rik van Riel , Ingo Molnar , akpm@firstfloor.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Benjamin Herrenschmidt , David Miller , Hugh Dickins , Mel Gorman , Nick Piggin , "Paul E. McKenney" Peter Zijlstra writes: > This patch-set makes part of the mm a lot more preemptible. It converts > i_mmap_lock and anon_vma->lock to mutexes and makes mmu_gather fully > preemptible. How about performance measurements? mutexes still behave quite differently from spinlocks, especially under contention. -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.