From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90CE0C4320A for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 20:29:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71B9260F91 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 20:29:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231650AbhGZTsp (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jul 2021 15:48:45 -0400 Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.232]:37256 "EHLO out02.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229580AbhGZTsp (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jul 2021 15:48:45 -0400 Received: from in01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.51]) by out02.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1m87Ds-001veA-FK; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 14:29:12 -0600 Received: from ip68-227-160-95.om.om.cox.net ([68.227.160.95]:43746 helo=email.xmission.com) by in01.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1m87Dr-003xRj-Fd; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 14:29:11 -0600 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Andreas Schwab Cc: Michael Schmitz , Brad Boyer , geert@linux-m68k.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org References: <87h7gopvz2.fsf@disp2133> <328e59fb-3e8c-e4cd-06b4-1975ce98614a@gmail.com> <877dhio13t.fsf@disp2133> <12992a3c-0740-f90e-aa4e-1ec1d8ea38f6@gmail.com> <87tukkk6h3.fsf@disp2133> <87eebn7w7y.fsf@igel.home> <20210725101253.GA6096@allandria.com> <87a6m8kgtx.fsf_-_@disp2133> <875yww7s01.fsf@igel.home> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 15:29:04 -0500 In-Reply-To: <875yww7s01.fsf@igel.home> (Andreas Schwab's message of "Mon, 26 Jul 2021 22:13:50 +0200") Message-ID: <87k0lcizu7.fsf@disp2133> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-XM-SPF: eid=1m87Dr-003xRj-Fd;;;mid=<87k0lcizu7.fsf@disp2133>;;;hst=in01.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=68.227.160.95;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX1+z32KOejNI9Ouby2CSqkDgwF558HbGxx0= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.227.160.95 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] signal/m68k: Use force_sigsegv(SIGSEGV) in fpsp040_die X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Sat, 08 Feb 2020 21:53:50 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Andreas Schwab writes: > On Jul 26 2021, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > >> diff --git a/arch/m68k/fpsp040/skeleton.S b/arch/m68k/fpsp040/skeleton.S >> index a8f41615d94a..ec767523c012 100644 >> --- a/arch/m68k/fpsp040/skeleton.S >> +++ b/arch/m68k/fpsp040/skeleton.S >> @@ -502,7 +502,8 @@ in_ea: >> .section .fixup,#alloc,#execinstr >> .even >> 1: >> - jbra fpsp040_die >> + bsrl fpsp040_die >> + jmp .Lnotkern > > That should be jbra instead of jmp. I will update my patch. Mind if I ask what the difference is? I could not find a reference mentioning jbra. Do I need to look in the gas source or do you know if there is a better source? Eric