From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Florian Weimer Subject: Re: [PATCH] y2038: fix socket.h header inclusion Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 15:37:07 +0100 Message-ID: <87mulsuu3w.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> References: <20190311153857.563743-1-arnd@arndb.de> <87k1h1fgkk.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <87a7hvded7.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <87o968y1uv.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <877ecwwckm.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: In-Reply-To: (Arnd Bergmann's message of "Mon, 18 Mar 2019 15:34:17 +0100") Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Deepa Dinamani , "David S . Miller" , Willem de Bruijn , alpha , linux-arch , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Parisc List , sparclinux , Laura Abbott , Networking , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux API , Josh Boyer , Linus Torvalds , Jeff Law List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org * Arnd Bergmann: > Ok, so not '__fds_bits'. > > Is '__kernel_fds_bits' ok? I would prefer to keep at least the > name __kernel_ namespace that we have for typedefs and the > occasional struct tag. glibc should be okay with that. We use __kernel_ in the math libraries for something completely different, but those files do not (or should not) include UAPI headers, and in any case, the set of such identifiers is really small. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from albireo.enyo.de ([5.158.152.32]:57576 "EHLO albireo.enyo.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727134AbfCROhO (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Mar 2019 10:37:14 -0400 From: Florian Weimer Subject: Re: [PATCH] y2038: fix socket.h header inclusion References: <20190311153857.563743-1-arnd@arndb.de> <87k1h1fgkk.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <87a7hvded7.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <87o968y1uv.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <877ecwwckm.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 15:37:07 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Arnd Bergmann's message of "Mon, 18 Mar 2019 15:34:17 +0100") Message-ID: <87mulsuu3w.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Deepa Dinamani , "David S . Miller" , Willem de Bruijn , alpha , linux-arch , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Parisc List , sparclinux , Laura Abbott , Networking , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux API , Josh Boyer , Linus Torvalds , Jeff Law Message-ID: <20190318143707.NgimjfxHtygDslPKNPqhL9h0KgoOfJfi8A9NPo-DwG4@z> * Arnd Bergmann: > Ok, so not '__fds_bits'. > > Is '__kernel_fds_bits' ok? I would prefer to keep at least the > name __kernel_ namespace that we have for typedefs and the > occasional struct tag. glibc should be okay with that. We use __kernel_ in the math libraries for something completely different, but those files do not (or should not) include UAPI headers, and in any case, the set of such identifiers is really small.